11-10-2018, 05:54 PM
(11-10-2018, 05:47 PM)jeffster Wrote:(11-10-2018, 04:48 PM)Canard Wrote: They were about one or two months behind on substantial completion, which nobody really blinked at because it was relatively on-time. They did a fantastic job.
Alright, that's what I kinda thought. I think it was this that I was expecting to get behind schedule, especially considering that winter sometimes starts early or finishes late or both.
Right. My point was that back in 2012 they didn't have a construction schedule yet, so the goal was to make sure the trains were ready before the earliest possible construction completion date.