10-18-2016, 08:28 AM
(10-17-2016, 11:13 AM)ijmorlan Wrote:(10-17-2016, 11:04 AM)Canard Wrote: For what it's worth, I've always wanted full-priority, but it was pointed out to me early on that accuracy in arriving at a scheduled time at a station is more important than just blasting end-to-end as fast as possible. Which, as a train guy first and foremost, is what I wanted.But I see the logic in keeping an integrated schedule, especially when it ties in with Bus.
It should get full priority, and the schedule should be planned to use the priority, with a reasonable buffer so that minor problems don’t immediately put the schedule off for the rest of the day. But yes, there should be a schedule and no transit vehicle should ever run “hot” (meaning, leaving a pickup point before the scheduled time).
What I would say is that the schedule should be as fast as possible, subject to being realistic in the face of reasonably foreseeable and reasonably common circumstances.
A early bus/train is no bus/train.