04-01-2016, 12:25 PM
(04-01-2016, 12:04 PM)JCnb Wrote: I'm not sure but I am assuming the dealership bridge has nothing to do with this, and that the existing culvert/bridge under Courtland simply isn't wide enough for the road, LRT and sidewalk therefore a separate bridge all together is begin used for pedestrians.
Probably cheaper, faster, easier than extending the existing bridge.
The FDPs state "Project co. to extend culvert as required for sidewalk" at the creek. There's also no mention of a new bridge on the plans. Not only that, but from driving past over the past months I've see the culvert being extended. So I really can't seem to figure out where this bridge is going, unless they widened the culvert and the private bridge needed to be extended?