Hey Guest,
Welcome, Join our awesome community where you can discuss on various topics
or Create an Account


Welcome Guest! In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away. Click here to get started.

Thread Rating:
  • 8 Vote(s) - 4.38 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit
Ion begins testing light rail vehicles over entire route

Quote:Anyone who's got into the habit of parking on the tracks will have to find somewhere else to park, since there's now the very real possibility that a train will be coming along those tracks. Bylaw officers will be enforcing the parking ban more strictly; vehicles parked on tracks will be towed and subject to a $40 fine.

Quote:Each of the 14 cars must log 600 hours of operation on the system before it's deemed ready for service, so more and more cars will be going up and down the tracks over the next few months, Galloway said. Bombardier is completing one new vehicle about every 15 days, he added.
Reply
I'm really curious if it's 600 km or 600 hours. That's a big difference!

(and I'm actually excited if it's 600 hours - because that almost guarantees lots of OT and weekend/night runs for burn-in, when I'm selfishly far more likely to be able to watch!)
For daily ion construction updates, photos and general urban rail news, follow me on twitter! @Canardiain
Reply
I assume that's either a misquote or just a flub from Galloway. The project agreement is quite specific about the burn-in test parameters.

Quote:3 Burn-In Tests

3.1 Upon successful completion of the Acceptance Tests, the Vehicle shall start the Burn‐In Test to
be conducted by the Region and the Vehicle Supplier, with operational support from Project Co
utilizing the Test Track and any other available track.

3.2 The 600 Km “Burn‐In Test" will be run on each Vehicle prior to final acceptance and shall be
free of class A, B, and C failures, as generally defined below; the only permissible fault shall be
of class D:
(a) Rescue towing/pushing is required ‐ Failure Mode Category A = Severe vehicle
impairment
(b) Out‐of‐service to carhouse ‐ Failure Mode Category B = Vehicle impairment
© In service to end of the line ‐ Failure Mode Category C = Minor vehicle impairment
(d) In service to end of the day ‐ Failure Mode Category D = No vehicle impairment

3.3 The test shall simulate revenue service, to the extent reasonably possible, and include regular
cycling of doors, PA announcements, and automatic passenger announcements, PEI operation,
radio communication as well as any other feature normally encountered in revenue service. Such
simulation may include manual activation of certain features. In the event that the A, B, and C
fault‐free continuous 600 km is not achieved the “burn‐in” will be repeated until the requirement
is met.

3.4 Upon successful completion of the Burn‐In Test, the Vehicle shall be eligible for issuance of a
Vehicle Final Acceptance Certificate.
Reply
1/2 - Thursday, January 11, 2018:

What an awesome day - finally got to see some movement out along the line up-close!

   
Crew gathering in the yard, B-MAXI L moving away, and Trackmobile powered up... all good signs!

   
Heading South of the switch, first.

   
Speaking of the Trackmobile - it's put on some serious weight!

   
View from Northfield.

   
At Northfield, a lucky person got to jump inside and power up the LRV! It was fun to watch - the destination board briefly scrolled through IP addresses and other unintelligible text... but after a few moments, it went clear and "502" popped up in the smaller route display at the base of the windscreen!
For daily ion construction updates, photos and general urban rail news, follow me on twitter! @Canardiain
Reply
2/2 - Thursday, January 11, 2018:

   
Before too long, it was finally time to head out into the real world.

   
Waterloo Regional Police Service was on hand to help manage traffic. It was interesting to see that only the Eastbound lanes of traffic were stopped with the railway arms - I can't think of any other place I've ever seen that where only half of the crossing arms come down. It makes perfect sense, but in my mind, I guess I'd just always pictured that "all" traffic would be stopped, here.

   
Heading across Northfield.

   
Best job in the world right now!

   
Approaching Colby/Conestogo.


I couldn't stick around for the rest of the afternoon (I do have a job besides getting excited about LRT, if you can imagine Smile ), but I understand that 502 was pulled up and down twice (both NB and SB tracks) before returning to the yard later in the afternoon.
For daily ion construction updates, photos and general urban rail news, follow me on twitter! @Canardiain
Reply
(01-11-2018, 07:25 PM)Bob_McBob Wrote: I assume that's either a misquote or just a flub from Galloway. The project agreement is quite specific about the burn-in test parameters.

FWIW I tweeted to him and he replied to say he must be mistaken if the project agreement says 600km.

https://twitter.com/tomjgalloway14/statu...0589780992
Reply
(01-11-2018, 09:04 PM)Canard Wrote: 2/2 - Thursday, January 11, 2018:


Before too long, it was finally time to head out into the real world.


Waterloo Regional Police Service was on hand to help manage traffic.  It was interesting to see that only the Eastbound lanes of traffic were stopped with the railway arms - I can't think of any other place I've ever seen that where only half of the crossing arms come down.  It makes perfect sense, but in my mind, I guess I'd just always pictured that "all" traffic would be stopped, here.


Heading across Northfield.


Best job in the world right now!


Approaching Colby/Conestogo.


I couldn't stick around for the rest of the afternoon (I do have a job besides getting excited about LRT, if you can imagine Smile ), but I understand that 502 was pulled up and down twice (both NB and SB tracks) before returning to the yard later in the afternoon.

Interesting. WRPS brought out the Pride cruiser for this one.
Reply
(01-11-2018, 09:04 PM)Canard Wrote: 2/2 - Thursday, January 11, 2018:


Before too long, it was finally time to head out into the real world.


Waterloo Regional Police Service was on hand to help manage traffic.  It was interesting to see that only the Eastbound lanes of traffic were stopped with the railway arms - I can't think of any other place I've ever seen that where only half of the crossing arms come down.  It makes perfect sense, but in my mind, I guess I'd just always pictured that "all" traffic would be stopped, here.


Heading across Northfield.


Best job in the world right now!


Approaching Colby/Conestogo.


I couldn't stick around for the rest of the afternoon (I do have a job besides getting excited about LRT, if you can imagine Smile ), but I understand that 502 was pulled up and down twice (both NB and SB tracks) before returning to the yard later in the afternoon.

What's the crenellated stuff around the train in those pics?
Reply
Used for testing clearance.
Reply
It’s common practice for roller-coaster pull through testing, which reveals clearance issues.

[Image: maxresdefault.jpg]

[Image: 200]

I can think of a handful of rides where structural modifications were required after the fact due to a failure during these tests... Millennium Force’s first overbank turn probably being the scariest!

[Image: millenniumforce03-43.jpg]

(That scallop in the one support arm was added after the ride was built, but before opening. I think about it every time I ride!)
For daily ion construction updates, photos and general urban rail news, follow me on twitter! @Canardiain
Reply
[video=youtube]https://youtu.be/i4LKzofxr0w[/video]
...K
Reply
[video=youtube]https://youtu.be/oYp4CP-9Gsw[/video]

Two clearance issues caught in this video, first with the construction barrel at the end of the curb (not a permanent fixture) and then an issue with the "LRT This Lane" sign on the pole at the far side of the intersection.

None of these involved the actual vehicle, just the 'foam fingers' of the clearance rig.  These do however represent a worst case envelope that allows for expansion, contraction, and a little bit of rock and roll, so that sign will have to be dealt with.
...K
Reply
[video=youtube]https://youtu.be/qUl18TFcMiU[/video]
...K
Reply
[video=youtube]https://youtu.be/2zs9hlSn9OY[/video]
...K
Reply
Awesome videos, Kevin and Canard! Thank you so much for sharing.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: aaron.thorpe, 8 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links

              Advertise