12-21-2018, 11:02 AM
I find it funny this is seriously an issue with people. Aesthetics seems like a poor reason to not allow it - at least in the winter months. Enforcement of parking over sidewalks needs to be improved anyway and should be enforced here as well. It seems like a funny thing to require a fee for when its an area that the homeowner is required to maintain anyway - but if there are costs here that I don't see (like enforcement of bylaws) then by all means it seems worth charging for.
These are the types of issues that I feel like people just object to because on principle they don't like cars. The legitimate problems (which seem minor) can be dealt with effectively. And this isn't a rant about "anti-car people", the same things happens in reverse all the time. Improvements for bikes or pedestrians get objected to for really dumb reasons.
These are the types of issues that I feel like people just object to because on principle they don't like cars. The legitimate problems (which seem minor) can be dealt with effectively. And this isn't a rant about "anti-car people", the same things happens in reverse all the time. Improvements for bikes or pedestrians get objected to for really dumb reasons.