02-25-2020, 10:23 AM
(02-25-2020, 08:22 AM)jamincan Wrote: Some people here clearly didn't live in the 90s.https://www.google.com/maps/@43.4472813,-80.4909645,3a,69.3y,35.85h,110.88t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sAIFYU0uirUSNqBe_0F0RPg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
Opened 2001 designed in the 90's
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.6875977,-79.3967852,3a,86.4y,348.39h,124.43t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sNLt2aCJ_9DexMXveKpQogA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
complete in 2007 probably design early 2000's
Maybe I was off by 5 years. Either way I don't get the argument that a new building should blend in with the current architecture of a neighbourhood. It hardly ever turns out.
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.4536918,...312!8i6656
In my opinion it is better to contrast the existing feel of the neighborhood to highlight both the old and the new. They all can't be winners though. It is good that this will add more residents within walking distance to the downtown.