02-06-2015, 01:48 PM
(02-02-2015, 10:44 PM)mpd618 Wrote: I forget where I saw this idea, but it's to have a limited number of officially heritage designated buildings (possibly proportional to population or building count). So once you've got a full basket of heritage protected buildings, adding a new one means removing one.
This would work well. You can't designate everything as heritage, you will just get a backlash (just see the comments on therecord.com when heritage buildings come up), you need to prioritize and decide which buildings are actually important.