05-28-2015, 10:31 PM
Markster your efforts are impressive; a re-evaluation is a good outcome.
Clearly the split inbound/outbound stops were not communicated as part of the consultation process. Even if there is good justification for the splitting of the inbound/outbound stops I can't see the rationale for placing them separately from existing stops that are only about 100m away (Queen@Homewood for the inbound, Queen@Joseph Schneider Haus for the outbound) rather than making new stops that only the 204 stops at; that would make Councillor Mitchell's comments about "just get a transfer and take the regular bus" to connect to the 204 even harder to execute in practice.
Is it just me or has there been an increase in the number of bus breakdowns this spring? It seems like I see multiple buses a day broken down or being towed.
Clearly the split inbound/outbound stops were not communicated as part of the consultation process. Even if there is good justification for the splitting of the inbound/outbound stops I can't see the rationale for placing them separately from existing stops that are only about 100m away (Queen@Homewood for the inbound, Queen@Joseph Schneider Haus for the outbound) rather than making new stops that only the 204 stops at; that would make Councillor Mitchell's comments about "just get a transfer and take the regular bus" to connect to the 204 even harder to execute in practice.
Is it just me or has there been an increase in the number of bus breakdowns this spring? It seems like I see multiple buses a day broken down or being towed.
Everyone move to the back of the bus and we all get home faster.