Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 4.75 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Grand River Transit
There will be a Weber Street Route; 18, running from University to Fairway which will supplant the current ixpress. Unfortunately, this roots and many other improvements to the core network are tied to the opening of ION, which at this point I'd wager will be September next year .
Reply


(07-28-2017, 05:51 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:
(07-28-2017, 05:34 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: You’re probably right, except that we were promised that emergency services could use the LRT lanes. If that is OK, then it should be OK for a bus to use them, especially temporarily and especially when there are no LRVs running.

These are not even remotely similar:

The bus, which has no direct connection with the LRT ops center, will be using the LRT right of way every 4-20 minutes (two ways remember) for a significant distance along the right of way, while Grandlinq is trying to complete the route so crews will be working in the right of way, and then they will be testing LRT trains in the right of way.

Is completely different from an ambulance occasionally using the LRT right of way during operations of the LRT when the right of way is cleared of Grandlinq contractors and other personnel, for a short distance to bypass traffic, when they have a direct communications with the ops center to gain clearance.

And by September, Grandlinq should be testing trains.

I guess that answers my question in the affirmative. Depending on the nature and duration of commissioning activities, I agree that running bus service on those lanes might be impractical.

However, I do have a couple of contrary thoughts as well:

1) There is no reason why the buses should be unable to communicate with LRT control. Buses and LRT are part of the same system so they should all be able to communicate together.

2) If the LRT had street-running segments, commissioning activities would have to minimize periods of unavailability of the street-running segments for other traffic. Using the LRT lanes as bus lanes is essentially using them as street-running segments, but with much less other traffic and with all other traffic in communication with transit control.

3) Although my original idea was that the 200 would simply run in the LRT lanes, except right at GRT to reach the bus stop (since buses don’t have left-side doors to use the LRT platform), an alternate idea would be for them to use the LRT for one block at a time when needed to pass congestion, whether it is general traffic or a 7 bus. This could be coordinated with commissioning activities by contacting LRT control by radio.

So I’m not convinced it’s definitely impossible, but I would have to know more about what is involved in remaining work on the LRT system to be able to really figure it out.
Reply
@ijmorlan

You make good points. I too think it is possible. I was perhaps too abrupt I just thought it was very oversimplified to say it was equivalent to running ems and fire vehicles on the rapidway.

The real question though is what are the benefits. If they only want to stop at GRH then unless King was substantially faster (which, with the lights and without priority I doubt it) then what does it buy you. Perhaps the public perception that the transit lanes are in use even now although on the flip side the impression that buses would have been fine. Either way, I don't think it's worth the effort even if I kind of fancy the idea.
Reply
Just looking at the EasyGO fare card information site, and after seeing this, it made me wonder;
"A 90-minute transfer is automatically loaded on your card when you pay your fare. If you transfer to another bus within 90 minutes, the farebox will read your transfer."

Currently you can use multiple buses within the 90 minutes allotted to the transfer. Will this continue to be the case with the incoming fare card? I find the above info a little ambiguous.
Reply
(07-30-2017, 12:04 AM)Elmira Guy Wrote: Currently you can use multiple buses within the 90 minutes allotted to the transfer. Will this continue to be the case with the incoming fare card? I find the above info a little ambiguous.

It should still be a 90-minute timed transfer, regardless of the number of buses.
Reply
(07-30-2017, 12:04 AM)Elmira Guy Wrote: Just looking at the EasyGO fare card information site, and after seeing this, it made me wonder;
"A 90-minute transfer is automatically loaded on your card when you pay your fare. If you transfer to another bus within 90 minutes, the farebox will read your transfer."

Currently you can use multiple buses within the 90 minutes allotted to the transfer. Will this continue to be the case with the incoming fare card? I find the above info a little ambiguous.

That's exactly what they're saying, it's just the language isn't so clear.

In essence:

-When you first tap in, the fare is deducted from your card; at the same time, a 'transfer' condition is set with a 90-minute limit.

-Next time you tap, that 'transfer' condition will be read if it is still present, and no fare will be deducted.
Reply
So you can transfer as much as you like, so long as your last transfer occurs 89 minutes and 59 seconds from the initial tap? Ie, your total journey time on one fare is 89m59s+Last Ride Time?
Reply


(07-30-2017, 09:58 AM)Canard Wrote: So you can transfer as much as you like, so long as your last transfer occurs 89 minutes and 59 seconds from the initial tap? Ie, your total journey time on one fare is 89m59s+Last Ride Time?

Correct. That's how it's worked for years with the paper transfers, for the record; this just takes the human operator out of the equation.
Reply
Cheers KevinL and mpd618.

I assumed this would be the case but wanted some confirmation.

I also hope that the fare cards are readily available at more places than the two terminals (I know they said some PR crew will also be handing them out).

I'm looking forward to this system being launched.
Reply
The only bad part about transfers being built into the card is the lack of being able to score extra time on the transfer based on when the operator updates the sharp edge.

But as an occasional rider, I'm looking forward to not having to trudge over to the store to buy tickets.
Reply
FWIW, the printed transfers from the new machines are giving us 99 minute transfers instead of 90. So I guess we get a few extra minutes without the generosity of operators? :)
Reply
(07-30-2017, 09:12 PM)chutten Wrote: FWIW, the printed transfers from the new machines are giving us 99 minute transfers instead of 90. So I guess we get a few extra minutes without the generosity of operators? Smile

Or most likely, you get even more generosity, at least with paper transfers with a printed time.
Reply
(07-30-2017, 10:15 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:
(07-30-2017, 09:12 PM)chutten Wrote: FWIW, the printed transfers from the new machines are giving us 99 minute transfers instead of 90. So I guess we get a few extra minutes without the generosity of operators? Smile

Or most likely, you get even more generosity, at least with paper transfers with a printed time.

I figure they should change the official number from 90 to 120 (2 hours) in order to match up better with actual existing practice. There is no reason to be stingy with the transfer period.
Reply


(07-31-2017, 06:45 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: I figure they should change the official number from 90 to 120 (2 hours) in order to match up better with actual existing practice. There is no reason to be stingy with the transfer period.

Of course there is. It opens it up to abuse and it's a loss of revenue.

Is anyone's route between two points actually 2h+Last Trip Time? If yes, then absolutely it needs to be adjusted (and that's absolutely horrible).
Reply
(07-31-2017, 07:04 AM)Canard Wrote:
(07-31-2017, 06:45 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: I figure they should change the official number from 90 to 120 (2 hours) in order to match up better with actual existing practice. There is no reason to be stingy with the transfer period.

Of course there is. It opens it up to abuse and it's a loss of revenue.

This is the current struggle with Toronto as they fade out the "trial" 2-hour transfer on St. Clair instead of expanding it to all routes.  Rather than having a straight forward system, they've decided to leave transfer rules as is, make Presto accommodate their transfer rules (which aren't very straight-forward at times), and not lose the $20 million in revenue per year that having a timed transfer system wide would cost them, despite the heaps of good will it would give them from travellers.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 17 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links