09-15-2021, 09:22 PM
(09-15-2021, 04:33 PM)jamincan Wrote: The only thing that makes sense to me is that it's a precursor step to initiate corridor improvements, but that doesn't really make much sense to me either. Politically, it's seems a lot easier to spend $100 million improving an existing GO line than it is spending $100 million to implement a new line.
If they wanted to do a precursor, they should implement service which makes sense and is useful.
While I have no evidence, it is believable that this is intended to fail, to provide evidence against implementing more transit.