04-18-2018, 01:22 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-18-2018, 01:22 PM by robdrimmie.
Edit Reason: Extraneous character.
)
I think that the City needs to figure out how to properly message the fact that they're willfully violating PARTS.
I hope they do, and I'm definitely of the opinion that the PARTS decisions for this part of the world were very poorly done, but it smells pretty bad for a planning structure to be put in place and then just a couple of years later have it abandoned. That's pretty straightforward erosion of trust. The Council members are in a bad place: Keep their word and block a high profile development, or break their word and build a development that achieves almost all their stated density goals.
I think the deferral is because they're still squirming. Uh, deciding.
I hope they do, and I'm definitely of the opinion that the PARTS decisions for this part of the world were very poorly done, but it smells pretty bad for a planning structure to be put in place and then just a couple of years later have it abandoned. That's pretty straightforward erosion of trust. The Council members are in a bad place: Keep their word and block a high profile development, or break their word and build a development that achieves almost all their stated density goals.
I think the deferral is because they're still squirming. Uh, deciding.