12-02-2017, 10:02 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-02-2017, 10:46 PM by Pheidippides.)
I don't doubt there is a flaw in my logic or calculations; it was just meant to provoke thought and discussion.
Maybe it was the way I phrase "savings" that is confusing.
It is actually the "additional ongoing expense" of those 10cm of road, every and every year (and that's not even accounting for inflation) is $1,562,548.
I would never envision that it would happen over night that all lanes would be 10cm narrower, but if with each reconstruction project or each new project (the region is expected to build 330 new km of road by 2026) a new standard was applied the amount of additional expense would be reduced.
I'll leave the more advanced logic and calculations to TriTag or someone with a bigger napkin to scribble upon.
Also, public opinion might not be as strong as you think. The region's budget survey found that 23% of respondents strongly agreed that roads were a good value for money, but 31% strongly agreed that transit was good value for money. Similarly, 46% of respondents would not be willing to pay more taxes for roads (44% of respondents would not be willing to pay more taxes for roads, but 55% of that 44% don't ever use transit - so 28%).
Maybe it was the way I phrase "savings" that is confusing.
It is actually the "additional ongoing expense" of those 10cm of road, every and every year (and that's not even accounting for inflation) is $1,562,548.
I would never envision that it would happen over night that all lanes would be 10cm narrower, but if with each reconstruction project or each new project (the region is expected to build 330 new km of road by 2026) a new standard was applied the amount of additional expense would be reduced.
I'll leave the more advanced logic and calculations to TriTag or someone with a bigger napkin to scribble upon.
Also, public opinion might not be as strong as you think. The region's budget survey found that 23% of respondents strongly agreed that roads were a good value for money, but 31% strongly agreed that transit was good value for money. Similarly, 46% of respondents would not be willing to pay more taxes for roads (44% of respondents would not be willing to pay more taxes for roads, but 55% of that 44% don't ever use transit - so 28%).
Everyone move to the back of the bus and we all get home faster.