09-22-2017, 07:39 AM
(09-22-2017, 07:16 AM)MidTowner Wrote: rangersfan, mixed usage can in effect be a requirement simply by denying variances to development that don't include it. In this case, the developer wants the benefit of increased density and reduced setbacks. That's fine- probably it's good. But I would say that, in return, he should be adding commercial space to serve both the new and existing residents of the neighbourhood.
If it complied with policy, wouldn't the developer just appeal the decision to the OMB?