Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 15 Vote(s) - 3.93 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit
Today, the Victoria Park station is getting its turn with the jackhammer, for either grounding or improper rail gap or both. Add it to the long list.
Reply


This is of course assuming that every bodies clocks are accurate to within a few seconds. This simply isn't the case even in a modern world with cell phones.
Reply
(10-18-2016, 06:28 AM)rangersfan Wrote: I really like the majority of the local LRT reporting it's good for a laugh.
You read the title and and the first few paragraphs and  it sounds like trails were ripped up etc.

Which they were.

Quote: Then the article stumbles to the heart of the matter, the land surrounding the track is all private property and the need for a crossing wasn't identified during the consultation phase as previously discussed. In fact if a crossing is put in place ( which I think should be done) it will be the first crossings for these residents that was technically not trespassing. Don't get me wrong I definitely understand the need for a crossing and the inconvenience this would cause for the local population.

Is a trail that connects to a properly framed entry through a fence on to private property "trespassing"? It sounds like an "entrance" to me.

It is important not to discount what was there before as illegal. They were informal, but accepted public paths. No one ever made them "official", but that does not mean they had not gained implicit recognition by various landowners in the area.
Reply
(10-18-2016, 09:43 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: This is of course assuming that every bodies clocks are accurate to within a few seconds. This simply isn't the case even in a modern world with cell phones.

What, you can't check in with the CBC time signal?  Wink
Reply
It doesn't matter if a vehicle arrives early. It's the deprture from a stop that matters.
Reply
(10-18-2016, 09:36 AM)Viewfromthe42 Wrote: Today, the Victoria Park station is getting its turn with the jackhammer, for either grounding or improper rail gap or both. Add it to the long list.

The Borden station (is that the correct name?) on Charles has been chewed up, too:
   

Are these the missing ground wires?
   
Reply
Rebar finally in place at the Cameron Heights switchover:
   

TPSS at Charles/Borden, next to Grand River Rocks:
   
Reply


Lots of activity on Ottawa St, finally!

Tracks laid at the curve from Ottawa to Charles.  And, yes, people seem to be unable to read signage.  (This is from Sunday)
   

Another shot of the curve, from this morning.
   

Embedded track laid, about half the distance from Charles St to the Schneider Creek bridge:

   

And sidewalks!  On the W side of Ottawa, there will be a huge boulevard between the sidewalk and the street.  Will there be bike lanes on Ottawa?
   
Reply
Overhead wires being removed on Charles!
   

This is what the wires look like close up:
   
Reply
Charles will look much better with those wooden poles removed. Great to see!
Reply
Re: Borden platform, no, those are not grounding wires. They may be used for testing the continuity of the rebar cage, however. Any grounding would be a much thicker cable. And it wouldn't just be sticking out the top randomly in a corner. Smile

Those hideous wooden poles can't leave us soon enough!
Reply
(10-18-2016, 08:28 AM)kitborn Wrote:
(10-17-2016, 11:13 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: It should get full priority, and the schedule should be planned to use the priority, with a reasonable buffer so that minor problems don’t immediately put the schedule off for the rest of the day. But yes, there should be a schedule and no transit vehicle should ever run “hot” (meaning, leaving a pickup point before the scheduled time).

What I would say is that the schedule should be as fast as possible, subject to being realistic in the face of reasonably foreseeable and reasonably common circumstances.

A early bus/train is no bus/train.

Perhaps I was unclear. The vehicles should follow the schedule, and the schedule should be designed to be as fast as possible subject to the reasonable constraints. But yes, if a particular vehicle happens to run fast over a segment of a route, it should wait at the next stop until it is no longer early, and this should happen often enough that a vehicle never runs noticeably early. Which pretty much means that vehicles should always run 0-1 minute late under ideal circumstances but never ever early.

Because you are absolutely right. Many transit “professionals” don’t seem to understand this. I’ve seen reference to “on-time” meaning plus or minus three minutes (on the TTC, in particular, although I’m sure there are other offenders), which is outrageous and no way to run a transit service.
Reply
Lots of fresh outer curb (both sides) along Duke, Queen to Young. Inner curb staking looks complete should mostly be in be weeks' end I would think.
Everyone move to the back of the bus and we all get home faster.
Reply


I saw that overhead platform lighting has been installed at the Caroline station.
Reply
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 19 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links