Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 13 Vote(s) - 3.85 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours
(06-13-2023, 12:06 PM)KevinL Wrote: I wonder where Service Ontario will move.

Service Ontario is on the second floor, and the permit is only for the floors above that.
Reply


Ah, noted.
Reply
There are already photos on this site: https://30duke.com/apartments/

[Image: kitchen-condo-855x1140.jpg][Image: bedroom-view-855x1140.jpg]
Reply
(06-13-2023, 10:23 AM)Lebronj23 Wrote: 30 Duke West being converted from office to residential. Site plan application submitted

SP23/047/D/ES Proposing to convert floors 3 – 10 from office to residential (128 units).s

The other tower was already previously converted.
Reply
(06-13-2023, 01:53 PM)jeremyroman Wrote: There are already photos on this site: https://30duke.com/apartments/

Those are probably from the previous phase. They converted the small back half-tower to residential a few years ago (before Covid). It makes sense to do the rest of the building, given how little office demand there is for old buildings like that, but the other tower is also likely far more difficult given the larger floorplate.
Reply
(06-13-2023, 02:17 PM)tomh009 Wrote:
(06-13-2023, 10:23 AM)Lebronj23 Wrote: 30 Duke West being converted from office to residential. Site plan application submitted

SP23/047/D/ES Proposing to convert floors 3 – 10 from office to residential (128 units).s

The other tower was already previously converted.

Hope they come up with a more elegant solution for the AC than they did in the smaller tower.   Between this and 22 Frederick, hopefully it puts a dent in DTK's office vacancy rate.
Reply
How is it possible to convert these office buildings into condos, when the windows cannot open? *applies also to 22 Frederick St. I cannot imagine living somewhere and not being able to open the windows each morning for fresh air…regardless of whatever air exchange / central air system they have.
Reply


(06-14-2023, 08:11 AM)kidgibnick Wrote: How is it possible to convert these office buildings into condos, when the windows cannot open? *applies also to 22 Frederick St. I cannot imagine living somewhere and not being able to open the windows each morning for fresh air…regardless of whatever air exchange / central air system they have.

Windows can be replaced.

And it doesn't even have to be all of them. When I had a condo apartment, I had something like 30 large glass windows and all of 5 of them were openable.

And if they're planning on balconies as some of them are, the balcony door is already your openable window.
Reply
Public meeting for 332 Charles st Easy

The City of Kitchener has received applications for an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to facilitate the development of a 17 storey multiple dwelling residential building with a Floor Space Ratio of 8.8. A total of 163 residential units, 65 vehicle parking spaces and 170 bicycle parking spaces are proposed for the development.

https://calendar.kitchener.ca/default/De...nt-332-Cha
Reply
(06-14-2023, 08:48 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Windows can be replaced.

And it doesn't even have to be all of them. When I had a condo apartment, I had something like 30 large glass windows and all of 5 of them were openable.

And if they're planning on balconies as some of them are, the balcony door is already your openable window.

That’s good to hear. Hopefully they’ll be able to do something similar with these conversions, so that at least one window per room can open. Balconies would be a fantastic addition, but I’m somehow doubtful that will happen.
Reply
Not sure what's going on, but scaffolding is going up in front of 256 King St E. Appears to also be partially in front of the NEO Architecture office next door.

   
Reply
(06-14-2023, 12:49 PM)kidgibnick Wrote:
(06-14-2023, 08:48 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Windows can be replaced.

And it doesn't even have to be all of them. When I had a condo apartment, I had something like 30 large glass windows and all of 5 of them were openable.

And if they're planning on balconies as some of them are, the balcony door is already your openable window.

Balconies would be a fantastic addition, but I’m somehow doubtful that will happen.

They'd be a total waste of money for the developer in this case. It would be pretty silly to add them in I think, unless they happen to have a ton of money to spend. Good chance they do though.

Overall...balconies are most often totally unnecessary in my opinion. Most people do not actually use their balconies. They're not private, the view begins to suck the denser your city/neighbourhood becomes, they're tiny, they're windy and ultimately really useless. Most people just use it for extra storage space. My condo is on the most upper floors of the taller tower at Harbour Plaza...do I ever use it? Or most of the people in the building? Heck no. It's way too windy (the lake doesn't help, but even without that you always feel the wind) rendering it pretty useless, not to mention the small size of an average balcony. Even here in Waterloo Region, I might see some cheap Home Hardware lawn furniture on balconies but very few people appear to actually use the space.

While this particular building (and 22 Frederick) are pretty short in comparison, it is a huge cost for the developer to add balconies to this. For every 10-12 floors, it costs on average roughly 1.5 to 2 million to add balconies to a new building. Paradoxically, they tend to cause the developer to lose revenue because they are losing actual usable square meters of space per unit that could have...well, been part of the home itself. Of course the cost usually goes down (but sometimes not, depending on the work required) when you are just renovating an existing building but it's still going to cost a fortune in both time, money and materials. All of which, of course, gets passed onto the customers buying or renting the unit. Also in new condo builds, balconies actually cause a developer to lose money. They can lose millions building balconies that will likely never really get used to justify the cost. Yet if they didn't build them, then that could have added many square meters of much more usable space to each unit/floor/building. But there is also a huge added cost to adding new balconies to existing buildings (like that one brutalist office tower in midtown/uptown that is proposed to be turned to residential). The addition of balconies is not likely going to reduce any square meters of space especially as they appear to be protruding, but it will add a shit ton of additional construction costs for something that most residents aren't going to use for much beyond growing some herbs or tomatoes and their bike, probably. That money could, rather, go into improving the building in other ways or staying in the developers coffers so that they can potentially develop more elsewhere.

I've worked in many countries in my line of work and I have found that there's a unique North American obsession with balconies when it comes to renting/buying a home (other countries too, of course). Essentially, it's the urban apartment/condo owners version of a green lawn that the suburbanites have. Totally useless, something they will rarely use and which costs money to have (whether in the up front costs in condo construction, or the constant mowing/watering/etc of a lawn). Quite often the nonsense features developers build like putting a tiny running track on the roof of a parking podium, a "party room" and a cheap Weber BBQ or a communal toilet also known as a hot tub/pool quickly wears off and people stop using them. If you've ever visited a building that has that but which was built in the 80s or 90s...I'm sure you've seen how little use those got over the decades. Heck even the 2000s. My partner used to own a condo in the City Place (Montage Tower, finished in 2008-9) development in downtown Toronto and I remember visiting her and seeing how poor quality and actually disgusting a lot of those skyscrapers were.

Elsewhere in the Western world, though, they aren't as commonplace. Go to Helsinki, you'll find residential highrises without. Berlin, Frankfurt - same thing. Rotterdam? Manchester? London? Stockholm? Similar deal. It's mostly over here that we have an obsession with "luxury" and private property/domain and so developers can grift people into thinking they do want a balcony on the 54th floor of Harbour Plaza or the 8th floor of 22 Frederick when they really don't. The millions that go into useless balconies - and in many cases the frivolous building amenities - could go to improving the individual units in each building or the structural materials used to construct it. I mean if you're spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on a new home then ideally you want it to be a good building, right? You don't want it to fall apart and you want it to look nice.

Of course...if you're not adding balconies then ideally try to add openable windows, especially in a building of this small of size.
Reply
The balconies might be similar to garages, in that people think they will value them but in reality they end up using them for something else.

How many garages are full of stuff, with the car parked out on the driveway? Turns out, what many people actually want once they’re in a house is more storage space, not an enclosed place to park their vehicle.

Of course, this isn’t an argument for not building garages. Really it’s an argument for people to be more thoughtful about their needs and for them to purchase accordingly.
Reply


(06-18-2023, 05:42 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: The balconies might be similar to garages, in that people think they will value them but in reality they end up using them for something else.

How many garages are full of stuff, with the car parked out on the driveway? Turns out, what many people actually want once they’re in a house is more storage space, not an enclosed place to park their vehicle.

Of course, this isn’t an argument for not building garages. Really it’s an argument for people to be more thoughtful about their needs and for them to purchase accordingly.

I was thinking swimming pools/saunas/hot tubs, all things that people aspire to more than actually use, but garages too.

Mostly my garage is a good place to store bicycles.
Reply
(06-18-2023, 06:34 PM)plam Wrote:
(06-18-2023, 05:42 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: The balconies might be similar to garages, in that people think they will value them but in reality they end up using them for something else.

How many garages are full of stuff, with the car parked out on the driveway? Turns out, what many people actually want once they’re in a house is more storage space, not an enclosed place to park their vehicle.

Of course, this isn’t an argument for not building garages. Really it’s an argument for people to be more thoughtful about their needs and for them to purchase accordingly.

I was thinking swimming pools/saunas/hot tubs, all things that people aspire to more than actually use, but garages too.

Mostly my garage is a good place to store bicycles.

I actually disagree with the premise and a few points, but first, this digression.

Garages here are pretty uncommon, but where they do exist, they rarely hold cars. I've seen one or two with a classic car, but given the lack of snow, there's even less motivation to store cars in garages here. There are however, plenty of bikes in garages. But most homes do not have a garage, most homes have a shed, even smaller row homes like ours include a shed (complete with electricity an locks) as part of original construction. And I think this reflects well the uses that are here.

For balconies, I don't know why people think they aren't used. Failing to see people on their balcony doesn't mean they aren't used. For some people they are a place to dry laundry, for others they are a place to step out and have a smoke, for others they'll be a place to step out and drink a coffee for ten minutes.

None of these things mean you're likely to see someone obviously using their balcony. Yes, most people do not host big parties and have extensive outdoor furniture, because most people do want to do those things have a house with a back yard.

But there's another aspect...most balconies are on large apartment buildings facing a noisy road. There is a huge gap in equality between the quiet outdoor spaces that single family homeowners get vs. the noisy polluted stroads that apartment dwellers get to "enjoy". And it gets even worse with towers where some people may not enjoy the extreme heights and winds that would apply on a 40th story balcony.

I can tell you that here (a place that holds the same people as Canada) balconies almost always have some seating and appear to be used occasionally at least. Many Dutch apartments from the 60s even have two balconies, a larger one off the living room (larger as in, could fit four seats), and a smaller one off the Kitchen.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 15 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links