Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 8 Vote(s) - 4.38 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Charlie West (Charles & Gaukel) | 31 fl | Complete
(08-21-2019, 01:00 PM)robdrimmie Wrote: Yeah, you can see some the same sloping from the other direction as well, eg in https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/...7#pid71677 which is taken from the Charles Terminal corner of Charles and Gaukel.

That is definitely not right haha.
Reply


What is not right?
Reply
Having sloping on in a building like that. It should be more or less level, excluding perhaps some basement level work where drainage is taken into account. But the floors of a 31 floor building shouldn't slope.
Reply
Isnt the first few floors a parking podium? They probably want a slope for water drainage when snow melts off the cars ?
Reply
I suspect the edge of the building isn't straight their, perhaps related to the wavy structure that will be the facade at that part of the building.
Reply
(08-21-2019, 01:48 PM)jamincan Wrote: I suspect the edge of the building isn't straight their, perhaps related to the wavy structure that will be the facade at that part of the building.
or that !!!
Reply
(08-21-2019, 01:46 PM)Rainrider22 Wrote: Isnt the first few floors a parking podium?  They probably want a slope for water drainage when snow melts off the cars ?

This. But this and residential units both.
Reply


(08-03-2019, 05:07 PM)kwtech Wrote: As of Aug 3 2019

From this the main parking ramp seems to be in the side of the building up against the manulife building. I suspect they ran out of distance the get the height they wanted in the length they had and needed to make up the <1 foot of slope we see to get the floor spacing correct. The slope would be in the first non-corner bay after the ramp.
Reply
(08-21-2019, 01:22 PM)ac3r Wrote: Having sloping on in a building like that. It should be more or less level, excluding perhaps some basement level work where drainage is taken into account. But the floors of a 31 floor building shouldn't slope.

That half of the podium is the parking garage, so I'm certain it's just part of the ramp for the parking garage. The residential units look flat like they're supposed to be.

It's really obvious when you look in person, and has been for months, so if it was in error I'm certain they'd have fixed it.
Reply
(08-21-2019, 06:40 PM)taylortbb Wrote:
(08-21-2019, 01:22 PM)ac3r Wrote: Having sloping on in a building like that. It should be more or less level, excluding perhaps some basement level work where drainage is taken into account. But the floors of a 31 floor building shouldn't slope.

That half of the podium is the parking garage, so I'm certain it's just part of the ramp for the parking garage. The residential units look flat like they're supposed to be.

It's really obvious when you look in person, and has been for months, so if it was in error I'm certain they'd have fixed it.

Thanks! I had no idea the parking was in the podium, though I haven't paid much attention to details on this. But now that does make sense, as I don't remember them digging down enough for parking. Most certainly it's drainage then.
Reply
(08-22-2019, 01:15 PM)ac3r Wrote:
(08-21-2019, 06:40 PM)taylortbb Wrote: That half of the podium is the parking garage, so I'm certain it's just part of the ramp for the parking garage. The residential units look flat like they're supposed to be.

It's really obvious when you look in person, and has been for months, so if it was in error I'm certain they'd have fixed it.

Thanks! I had no idea the parking was in the podium, though I haven't paid much attention to details on this. But now that does make sense, as I don't remember them digging down enough for parking. Most certainly it's drainage then.
There might be some lower level parking.  They went at least four floors below ground.
Reply
(08-22-2019, 01:33 PM)Rainrider22 Wrote:
(08-22-2019, 01:15 PM)ac3r Wrote: Thanks! I had no idea the parking was in the podium, though I haven't paid much attention to details on this. But now that does make sense, as I don't remember them digging down enough for parking. Most certainly it's drainage then.
There might be some lower level parking.  They went at least four floors below ground.

There is underground parking, but I don't think it was 4 levels down. I only saw two levels when watching them building. The hole looked really deep though, so I was surprised it was only 2.
Reply
(08-22-2019, 01:33 PM)Rainrider22 Wrote: There might be some lower level parking.  They went at least four floors below ground.
2 levels of underground parking based on my old photos.
Reply


There was at least one level below the parking that was mechanical only. The excavation was very deep on this one compared to other new building digs..
Reply
Just about done the podium (there's one more floor to go on the left half here — the parking garage). Things should start moving along more quickly now!

[Image: 4XKNbw8.jpg]
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links