02-12-2019, 12:12 AM
(02-11-2019, 03:31 PM)Canard Wrote: If you drive into a fixed metal object with an infinitely small cross sectional area at the point of contact, it poses a massive safety risk to the occupant of the vehicle.
While this is true, if the metal bollard isn't there then the car is driving into a cyclist (potentially) which is a massively safety risk for the cyclist. Given the presence of crumple zones on cars, and the lack of them on cyclists, I think it makes more sense for the car to take the impact.
I definitely get your point on most roads where it's a grassy median or other place that we don't expect pedestrians/cyclists to be, but for the case of the bike lanes the damage to the car is to protect the occupant of the bike lane.