05-31-2020, 03:34 PM
(05-31-2020, 02:53 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:(05-31-2020, 02:32 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: They don’t have to be. City-owned golf courses are for the benefit of the citizens of the City; if a greater benefit can be had by opening them for walking than by opening them for golfing, then they should be for walking.
I'm not saying I disagree, but it's not fair to say it's as simple as just opening them for walking while they were closed for golf.
Why?