10-14-2019, 09:10 AM
(10-13-2019, 09:49 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(10-13-2019, 08:33 PM)jgsz Wrote: But their constituents are not a monolithic block. They have various diverse and conflicting views. Which constitutes would the independent represent?
All of them. That’s how it is supposed to work.
....
That's a rather fanciful and romanticised notion of what an independent representative can do. I suspect those who favour independents are folks who are quite comfortable with the status quo. I say that because a parliament full of independents (338 in the Canadian parliament) would, at best, accomplish absolutely nothing. At worst, they would create chaos and anarchy.
We have political parties to accomplish things. Would it help if political parties were called "teams?" We have political parties, or teams, if you prefer, because they are more effective than individuals. That's why we have sports teams. Can you imagine what would happen if the Kitchener Rangers were independents and not team players? They would never win! Same would be true in politics. If independents is such a good idea why are there no democratic governments in the world made up of independents? Because it's not a good idea. That's why.
Regardless, I'd like to discuss the need for PR rather than political parties.