(03-08-2018, 12:33 PM)Rainrider22 Wrote:(03-08-2018, 12:26 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I asked him a question, I didn't say, call him an "idiot" for example. I didn't question his integrity, or his character, I asked him about his motivations.
"So you'll volunteer so long as you aren't forced to see what it costs you" That was a judgmental comment directed at him. No one said you called him names. But you did turn it to a directed personal comment. It is ok to accept when you are wrong.
I think any discussion of what, if anything, Dan may have done wrong should wait until after the apology for outright calling him an “idiot”, which is indisputably unparliamentary and inappropriate.