01-24-2015, 11:58 AM
It looks like these urban outdoor spaces are getting some love.
However, it seems almost universal now for development requests to seek and obtain exemption from greenspace dedication requirements. One example which comes to mind is the 144 Park-155 Caroline project in Waterloo. The equivalency trade-off there was an "amenity space" on the roof of the podium. However, in order to post pictures of that space in this thread, one will either have to trespass or buy or visit a unit in the development.
Should these public pockets make a comeback in intensification planning?
However, it seems almost universal now for development requests to seek and obtain exemption from greenspace dedication requirements. One example which comes to mind is the 144 Park-155 Caroline project in Waterloo. The equivalency trade-off there was an "amenity space" on the roof of the podium. However, in order to post pictures of that space in this thread, one will either have to trespass or buy or visit a unit in the development.
Should these public pockets make a comeback in intensification planning?