11-18-2016, 03:51 PM
(11-17-2016, 06:21 PM)BuildingScout Wrote:(11-17-2016, 05:22 PM)jgsz Wrote: It looks nice. But $100 million? I guess it costs lots of money to recreate something that never was.
Plus the horrible name: "gas light district". Couldn't they find a nice fact from the past to reminisce about? gas light was an expensive, highly polluting, inferior form of illumination. If we are going that way, how about "outhouse district" or "polio district" or "women can't vote district?"
"Couldn't they find a nice fact from the past to reminisce about? "
Isn't that what they did?