11-17-2016, 10:00 AM
Thanks for the link! It's easy to see why consumption charges alone is not the best way to fund the system- the costs don't have a high correlation with the actual flows.
I would say we need a fixed component to the charges, and that the only way it would be fair would be to base it on lot size or frontage, to reflect the added infrastructure needed by each user at lower densities. I'm not sure if this would fly politically here.
I would say we need a fixed component to the charges, and that the only way it would be fair would be to base it on lot size or frontage, to reflect the added infrastructure needed by each user at lower densities. I'm not sure if this would fly politically here.