05-20-2016, 03:07 PM
(05-20-2016, 02:47 PM)dunkalunk Wrote:(05-20-2016, 11:04 AM)tomh009 Wrote: Is the 6m width a hard requirement or just a recommendation?
EDIT: The presentation says "Metrolinx recommends an underpass width of six metres" (emphasis mine). So this seems to be a feasible option, even if it doesn't meet the recommendation.
My understanding from the consultations that in order for Metrolinx to approve funding an underpass at a GO station, it needs to meet their standards for an underpass at a GO station. Otherwise the city/region would be on the hook.
If that's the situation, I would have expected the region's presentation to say "Metrolinx requires an underpass width of six metres". Really, we have insufficient data once again.