(05-20-2016, 10:35 AM)Canard Wrote: It is exactly the problem - 4m is the widest the underpass would go. I didn't see the slide by my other half pointed out on our way home that it can't be the full 6m required because of the utility issue - which basically eliminated the underpass from being a possibility.
While Tokyo may say 4m is fine, here I guess there is a 6m minimum requirement.
It wasn't eliminated from being a possibility, though, it's one of the options being considered. And six metres is not a "requirement," it's a "recommendation" by Metrolinx according to the information.
How long would the underpass be? Four metres, or more than 13 feet, does not seem particularly narrow to me, either.