Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | Complete
(04-06-2016, 01:32 PM)modernizt Wrote: What are you talking about? Glass offers almost no insulating value, and insulated spandrel panels still don't come anywhere close to the thermal/insulating performance of an insulated solid wall system.

Before the misinformation gets too far in this thread - let it be known that glazing systems are weak in terms of thermal performance. That said, there are many ways to mitigate this using the latest building science advancements, and like much of architecture, decisions often fall in the grey area between matters of sustainability/energy efficiency and other architectural concerns such as aesthetic, feel of the space, light, ventilation, tectonics, etc. etc.

Gosh, talk about misinformation.

First, glass is a wonderful insulating material. A 1/4" single pane of glass has the same R-value as four times as much gypsum, three times as much plywood, and 16 times as much brick and/or concrete.

Second, a modern triple pane window has about 3x the R-value of a single pane, so now you have that a modern glass pane has about the same R-value as 16 times as much gypsum, 12 times a much plywood and 48 times as much brick and/or concrete, which is why current European regulations favour glass enclosed buildings.

Third, a glass enclosed building uses glass+air gap+inside glass/wall for insulation.

This gives an R-value of 12 for the glass+air+glass sections and 21 for the glass+air+wall sections. For comparison fiber glass with 2x4 wood studs has an R value of 12, so we just made the glass sections have performance similar to conventional non-transparent insulation and the walled sections have performance second to none.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Drake - 11-02-2014, 08:53 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 11-03-2014, 12:22 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Canard - 11-16-2014, 11:26 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 11-17-2014, 07:56 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Canard - 11-16-2014, 06:14 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 11-17-2014, 07:57 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Drake - 11-17-2014, 09:38 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Smore - 12-29-2014, 08:47 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 12-30-2014, 11:01 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Lens - 01-17-2015, 09:46 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 01-22-2015, 07:59 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by The85 - 01-23-2015, 02:59 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by 519 - 01-23-2015, 04:47 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Lens - 02-18-2015, 05:47 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Lens - 02-28-2015, 01:52 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 03-02-2015, 03:25 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by nms - 03-02-2015, 01:18 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Lens - 03-02-2015, 03:43 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by REnerd - 03-02-2015, 06:07 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Lens - 03-02-2015, 06:27 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 03-03-2015, 07:55 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 03-04-2015, 07:59 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by TMKM94 - 03-04-2015, 01:21 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 03-04-2015, 08:01 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Lens - 03-04-2015, 01:39 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Drake - 03-04-2015, 08:34 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Drake - 03-06-2015, 08:20 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 03-08-2015, 09:45 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Drake - 03-13-2015, 10:05 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by KevinL - 03-15-2015, 11:43 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 03-16-2015, 10:14 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Lens - 03-20-2015, 08:49 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by TMKM94 - 03-20-2015, 10:27 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 03-21-2015, 09:57 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by TMKM94 - 03-23-2015, 05:39 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Drake - 03-23-2015, 08:32 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Drake - 03-29-2015, 03:24 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by YKF - 03-27-2015, 10:03 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by plam - 03-27-2015, 09:36 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by ookpik - 03-28-2015, 09:49 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by ookpik - 03-28-2015, 10:59 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Lens - 04-06-2015, 10:47 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Drake - 04-25-2015, 06:44 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Smore - 04-25-2015, 07:42 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Lens - 04-25-2015, 08:34 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 04-27-2015, 06:54 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by mpd618 - 04-25-2015, 10:10 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by JCnb - 05-04-2015, 10:02 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 05-25-2015, 07:00 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 06-21-2015, 09:41 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Cmb - 06-24-2015, 12:58 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Drake - 06-24-2015, 10:04 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 06-25-2015, 07:30 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by KevinL - 08-22-2015, 04:36 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 08-22-2015, 07:41 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by REnerd - 09-29-2015, 08:52 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Lens - 09-30-2015, 09:31 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 10-01-2015, 05:51 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Chris - 10-03-2015, 12:19 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 10-04-2015, 10:29 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Canard - 10-03-2015, 07:14 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by GtwoK - 10-26-2015, 11:31 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by kps - 12-13-2015, 06:32 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Smore - 11-18-2015, 05:05 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by kps - 11-25-2015, 05:21 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by ac3r - 12-02-2015, 11:08 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 12-03-2015, 09:25 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Drake - 12-13-2015, 06:49 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by timc - 12-13-2015, 10:22 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by GtwoK - 01-26-2016, 03:34 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 01-27-2016, 08:53 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 01-27-2016, 08:54 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by mpd618 - 01-26-2016, 10:35 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Canard - 01-27-2016, 06:42 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Canard - 01-27-2016, 10:37 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by mpd618 - 01-27-2016, 11:30 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by GtwoK - 02-02-2016, 01:38 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Canard - 02-02-2016, 07:35 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Owen - 02-02-2016, 10:11 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by GtwoK - 02-02-2016, 01:31 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Chris - 02-02-2016, 12:46 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Watdot - 02-02-2016, 02:35 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by REnerd - 02-02-2016, 03:57 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Canard - 02-08-2016, 09:54 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by dubya - 02-18-2016, 11:13 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by GtwoK - 02-16-2016, 03:27 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by mpd618 - 02-16-2016, 04:44 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 02-18-2016, 08:36 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by REnerd - 02-18-2016, 11:03 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by ac3r - 03-26-2016, 08:56 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Owen - 03-28-2016, 11:39 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by GtwoK - 04-04-2016, 06:10 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by jgsz - 04-05-2016, 05:10 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by plam - 04-06-2016, 07:01 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by plam - 04-06-2016, 09:22 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by BuildingScout - 04-06-2016, 02:46 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Andy - 04-06-2016, 09:17 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by GtwoK - 06-14-2016, 07:23 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 06-15-2016, 08:19 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by GtwoK - 09-28-2016, 06:45 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by KevinL - 09-28-2016, 10:04 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by GtwoK - 09-30-2016, 11:33 AM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Lens - 10-16-2016, 06:48 PM
RE: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 08-25-2014, 05:09 PM
Re: One Victoria | 63 m | 19 fl | U/C - by Spokes - 09-16-2014, 11:01 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links