08-29-2015, 08:48 PM
The "rideION.ca/abrt" page now has questions about "BRT" rather than "aBRT."
Most BRT implemented in North America is watered down, and little better than conventional bus service. That's by-and-large the case with the service in Cambridge. If they have to call it anything, call it "future Ion LRT extension." I never understood "aBRT," but it's annoying if GRT will increasingly call it BRT. Good BRT can be very, very good, and we could use some of it on various corridors in the Region.
Most BRT implemented in North America is watered down, and little better than conventional bus service. That's by-and-large the case with the service in Cambridge. If they have to call it anything, call it "future Ion LRT extension." I never understood "aBRT," but it's annoying if GRT will increasingly call it BRT. Good BRT can be very, very good, and we could use some of it on various corridors in the Region.