General Road and Highway Discussion - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: General Road and Highway Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=335) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
|
RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - MidTowner - 07-28-2017 "MidTowner, why are you not a fan of MUT's? ...As a pedestrian, I guess, you might not like them because now you have to share? That's the only thing I could think of..." I don't prefer them on bike or on foot, but on foot I don't think of them too much (for all intents and purposes, it's the same as a sidewalk when you're walking). On bike, I'm not a fan of riding alongside people on foot, travelling at a different speed and possibly about to do something I can't predict. I prefer to ride on the street (depending on the street, of course). That having been said, where there are real space constraints and where there aren't huge numbers of people on foot or bike anyway, I think they can make sense. Like here. MUTs on either side here would be preferable to just skipping a sidewalk on one side. RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - highlander - 07-28-2017 My main issue with MUTs is that you've just replaced the car/bike conflict with a bike/pedestrian conflict. It can work in the same way biking on the street works - low speed, low volume. It's a good choice for along arterials like this, but in busy areas they generally don't serve either pedestrians or cyclists well. My main issue with the way we build MUTs in WR are that they don't seem to know how to deal with them at either signalized intersections or roundabouts. Its inconsistent and usually relies on a cyclist to dismount or break the law. It also appears that the more recent roads where they are putting in MUTs no longer have painted bike lanes. The downside to this is that most "sport cyclists" are going to be travelling 30+ km/h and will not want to be on a shared path (nor should they for obvious safety reasons; in fact, many places are putting ~20 km/h speed limits on their MUTs). So these cyclists will be back in the general lanes, which isn't good for anyone. I think the current practice of using MUTs is a good step towards proper separated infrastructure. All they need is a sidewalk next to the MUT and proper treatment at intersections, and the MUT can be a high quality, 3m unidirectional cycle path. RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - highlander - 07-28-2017 Oh, and back to the discussion of Weber... I occasionally bike over this bridge, and I just take the lane and consciously try to keep my speed up. As a pretty experienced, confident cyclist, that southbound bike lane sandwiched between the concrete wall of the bridge and a general traffic lane is terrible - no way I would choose that over the MUT. In my opinion, having it there is worse than not, because some inexperienced cyclist is going to think its fine and then find themselves with 1.48m between a concrete wall and a passing transport truck/bus/whatever. They should either narrow the lanes and put an MUT on both sides, or grow a backbone and go back to the original recommendation. RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - danbrotherston - 07-28-2017 (07-28-2017, 11:13 AM)highlander Wrote: My main issue with MUTs is that you've just replaced the car/bike conflict with a bike/pedestrian conflict. It can work in the same way biking on the street works - low speed, low volume. It's a good choice for along arterials like this, but in busy areas they generally don't serve either pedestrians or cyclists well. This is exactly on point, bears repeating. MUTs work in low traffic areas, but higher traffic areas (Iron Horse Trail) see a lot of conflicts (and a lot of resulting complaining). Sport cyclists do not like them because they become a danger and are slowed down. Intersections right now are a complete failure, on the border of entrapment frankly. If I ever got a ticket, I'd fight it in court. And, generally designs are just poor with uneven surfaces (no need for curbs like we have on them). Here's an example of a particularly egregious (and brand new) example on King: https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.4946633,-80.5287615,3a,75y,180.74h,84.82t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s7lL11gdxUOvn6hmV3I_dhg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 You'll note this is the MUT that the cyclist who was killed was not using. I wonder if intersections like this contributed to his choice to use the traffic lanes instead. Frankly, at this intersection, one would wonder if cyclists are even allowed to use this infrastructure. RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - Coke6pk - 07-31-2017 I noticed at the corner of Manitou and Wabinaki there appears to be "bike streetlights" wrapped in black. I haven't seen anything about these other than a post about that type of infrastructure maybe coming in the future to an Uptown Waterloo intersection. Coke RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - Coke6pk - 07-31-2017 Construction continues along Lackner between Fairway & Zeller... all the MUT's and sidewalks appear completed, and there are two new relief islands as well. One thing that struck me as odd, they have poured a cement island for the turn from s/b (w/b?) Fairway to e/b (n/b?) Lackner, and have footings for what appear to be traffic signals. The signals here have been on ropes for years, as I've always been on the understanding that there is a roundabout scheduled to be constructed here. Maybe since there is a school, they are crossing signals only? Anyone know more? Coke RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - Markster - 07-31-2017 This past weekend, I was out cycling on Wellington/Shirley/Bingemans, and noticed that it looked like on the north side, there was an amply wide area leveled with a gravel base, separated from the road by the curb. I really hope that's going to be a MUT. That road is a fast one, and was not exactly the most pleasant to bike down in its current state. RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - timc - 07-31-2017 I hope that it will be an MUT as well, although I do expect there to be bike lanes once the road is done. RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - Canard - 07-31-2017 So, heading Northbound on 85, there are 4 lanes at Ottawa. After that, it splits; two lanes "express" and two lanes "collector". The exit to Frederick and Victoria via Bruce is the first exit after the split. I guess last night they dedicated the right lane as exit only for that, and only the 3rd (leftmost collector) lane now goes straight through! Person in front of me violently swerved across traffic; I imagine there are going to be a lot of close calls in the next day or two until everyone gets used to the new configuration. RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - sevenman - 07-31-2017 (07-31-2017, 12:07 PM)Markster Wrote: This past weekend, I was out cycling on Wellington/Shirley/Bingemans, and noticed that it looked like on the north side, there was an amply wide area leveled with a gravel base, separated from the road by the curb. I really hope that's going to be a MUT. That road is a fast one, and was not exactly the most pleasant to bike down in its current state. According to the design and construction report, there are bike lanes proposed for both sides of this new road. RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - Square - 07-31-2017 (07-31-2017, 07:52 PM)Canard Wrote: So, heading Northbound on 85, there are 4 lanes at Ottawa. After that, it splits; two lanes "express" and two lanes "collector". The exit to Frederick and Victoria via Bruce is the first exit after the split. I guess last night they dedicated the right lane as exit only for that, and only the 3rd (leftmost collector) lane now goes straight through! According to the region road closures, From: Sun 30 Jul, 2017 To: Mon 31 Jul, 2017 Highway 85 Northbound Collectors From: South of Frederick street Kitchener Closed Collector full closure Road Construction MTO - Call 511 Only a 1 day closure? RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - Canard - 08-01-2017 No, that says a full closure. Only the right lane is closed, and it was definitely a long-term reconfiguration. Lines painted and everything. RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - tomh009 - 08-01-2017 Westheights Drive in Kitchener has been repaved. The same layout, still allowing street parkings, but at least the markings are clear now. I think the original pavement was something like 45 years old ... RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - Markster - 08-01-2017 Pylons have been staged on Weber St between University and Erb. Expect lane reductions soon. The closures page says it's resurfacing. That road is in pretty terrible shape, and basically unusable for bikes. RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - jwilliamson - 08-01-2017 Any idea if they're going to put the island in on the Laurel Trail at the same time? It seems a shame to resurface and then tear a chunk up again in a few months. |