General Road and Highway Discussion - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: General Road and Highway Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=335) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
|
RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - danbrotherston - 11-04-2022 (11-03-2022, 05:53 PM)dtkvictim Wrote:(11-03-2022, 03:32 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: It is not the case that someone needs to be able to pull over everywhere, that is certainly not the case here (*most* residential two way streets cannot accommodate two way traffic along them, and drivers must pull aside into empty parking spaces or onto the sidewalk to pass each other). For example here: https://www.google.com/maps/@52.1665243,5.4021461,3a,60y,38.19h,95.39t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s6zJZNW8kykPMOMrHgtJLUg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192 The distance between the vehicles and the curb is about 4 meters, which is narrower than the narrowest section of Halls Ln and this is a two way road. If there is two way traffic, usually vehicles must pull over, although sometimes...if both cars are very small, they'll just pass. This is a fairly low traffic road, but it's not a tiny cul-de-sac or anything. I am not really sure how much traffic Charlie West will generate, but sans Charlie West, Halls Ln definitely carries less than this street. (11-03-2022, 05:53 PM)dtkvictim Wrote:(11-03-2022, 03:32 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I do realise in North America because of our different context, there's a much higher chance of getting two drivers who both refuse to pull in, who then come face to face and throw a tantrum about it. Yeah, lots of cars parked up the curb. I believe it's mostly legal parking. The Netherlands is great for biking, but definitely much less good for walking (although still far better than most of Canada). FWIW...drivers do block bike lanes and sidewalks, albeit less often than in Canada because well, frankly there's less need--and literally no other reason. But it's also less of an issue, because the roads are just generally safer. Lol...yeah...I've probably told the story before but I had someone park in my space (that I fucking paid for) and our super told me to just park in visitor...and they ticketed me for it. I just paid it, but these days, I'd be far less polite about it. Frankly, if someone dumped an un-plated vehicle in on my property, I'd have the refuse removed from my property and sell it for scrap. RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - dtkvictim - 11-04-2022 (11-04-2022, 06:04 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: Yeah, lots of cars parked up the curb. I believe it's mostly legal parking. The Netherlands is great for biking, but definitely much less good for walking (although still far better than most of Canada). FWIW...drivers do block bike lanes and sidewalks, albeit less often than in Canada because well, frankly there's less need--and literally no other reason. But it's also less of an issue, because the roads are just generally safer. Is parking like this legal there? https://www.google.com/maps/@52.0619017,5.1168683,3a,50.3y,19.56h,85.31t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sI-kecZwompl4ursDD-3qsQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192 It's one of the first streets I dropped into, and it surprised me. Not terribly harmful I guess, but still surprised me. Not nearly as bad as what I often see in footage from the UK though, where it's seemingly normal to block the majority of a sidewalk while parking on narrow roads. RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - danbrotherston - 11-05-2022 (11-04-2022, 07:46 PM)dtkvictim Wrote:(11-04-2022, 06:04 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: Yeah, lots of cars parked up the curb. I believe it's mostly legal parking. The Netherlands is great for biking, but definitely much less good for walking (although still far better than most of Canada). FWIW...drivers do block bike lanes and sidewalks, albeit less often than in Canada because well, frankly there's less need--and literally no other reason. But it's also less of an issue, because the roads are just generally safer. I cannot imagine that it isn't allowed, as it is extremely common. That being said, there are places where it is apparent that drivers are expected to park half up the curb (usually not blocking completely the sidewalk), but the curb is almost always hard surfaced. I've never seen it where people are expected to park up on grass. In other cases it appears to be a situation where "unusual parkers" (i.e., tradespeople, not residents nor visitors) park up the curb, and this I've seen on grass more than once (this for example, often happens on my street as there is no parking in front of our homes). The Netherlands is not anti-car...by any measure. To the contrary, they have a high car ownership rate (although lower than the EU at large) and have many many roads, free parking, etc. I know a lot of people point out Copenhagen as the better learning experience for NA, but I think the Netherlands is pretty much the thing that NA planners don't want you to know about (or even admit to themselves), because it shows just how grossly incompetent they have been. I plan to write a piece about it soon. FWIW...the Netherlands does far more to limit the harm that vehicles cause than EVs do--cars do not dominate the cities, they are reasonably restricted in places where it makes sense, and people have complete freedom NOT to own one, or to own one if they want...if it wasn't for climate change (and air pollution)...it might even be sustainable. RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - dtkvictim - 11-07-2022 To add to the Gaukel St speculation, No Entry signs were added to the pedestrian portion, I think in the last few days. I think this either suggests that the remainder of Gaukel St will be opened to through traffic, or that more permanent closure infrastructure is being installed on the pedestrian portion (previously the No Entry signs were on those movable wooden barricades). RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - GtwoK - 11-13-2022 Anyone know if they're planning on finishing the Ottawa St (at King / Charles) reconstruction before the end of the year? From what I recall, asphalt plants shut down around mid november, and they've still got the whole King / Ottawa intersection dug up as well as between there and Charles. Would be a pain to have that detour in place until the spring RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - Rainrider22 - 11-13-2022 I actually writing to my councilor to enquire. I am becoming concerned with exactly what you said. This is terrible planning and the contractors are taking way too long for 600 meters of roadway... RE: General Road and Highway Discussion - timio - 11-13-2022 I've seen paving done as late as mid December, so there's still likely time. RE: TEK Tower (30 Francis) | 45 fl | Proposed - dtkvictim - 11-15-2022 (10-30-2022, 09:39 PM)taylortbb Wrote: Is straight through actually prohibited? I noticed the road paint shows only left and right turns, but my understanding is that's not legally binding. There would need to be a no straight through sign up, which I haven't seen (though also haven't looked closely). I was assuming it was just a paint error. A bit off topic, but since the original discussion was here... There are indeed no straight through signs up now: RE: TEK Tower (30 Francis) | 45 fl | U/C - ijmorlan - 11-15-2022 Why is the straight-through bicycle lane green only in one direction? My initial thought was that the other direction didn’t have a must-turn for motor vehicles, but that’s not what the paint on the road on the far side of the intersection seems to be saying. RE: TEK Tower (30 Francis) | 45 fl | U/C - dtkvictim - 11-15-2022 (11-15-2022, 10:51 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: Why is the straight-through bicycle lane green only in one direction? My initial thought was that the other direction didn’t have a must-turn for motor vehicles, but that’s not what the paint on the road on the far side of the intersection seems to be saying. (Perhaps an admin can this can be moved to the cycling thread if needed) Because the cycle track, just behind me, is bidirectional (both directions on one side). So bicycles going straight south, the straight through that isn't green, are crossing the path of northbound motor traffic that must turn right or left and so they have to yield to motor traffic I think. Whereas for bicycles going straight northbound, both north and southbound motor traffic, which has to turn, will be crossing the path of the bicycles and must yield. It's a garbage intersection, and a minority of people will understand how to use it (both cyclists and motorists). Heck, I'm not even 100% confident in what I've written. RE: TEK Tower (30 Francis) | 45 fl | U/C - ijmorlan - 11-16-2022 (11-15-2022, 11:20 PM)dtkvictim Wrote: Heck, I'm not even 100% confident in what I've written. Thanks for the attempt. I’m looking forward to getting down there to see it in person. RE: TEK Tower (30 Francis) | 45 fl | U/C - Chris - 11-16-2022 I can't wait for one cyclist to let hook another from that left turn box. I don't understand why it's painted in that location? I think that box should be rotated 90 degrees for a turn onto Ontario? I was so excited for this cycling network but the implementation seems really awkward. RE: TEK Tower (30 Francis) | 45 fl | U/C - clasher - 11-16-2022 So the idea with that left turn box is instead of just waiting for the green to make a standard left turn, you sit there and wait for another green to avoid crossing in front of the few cars and bikes that use Ontario street? RE: TEK Tower (30 Francis) | 45 fl | U/C - Chris - 11-16-2022 (11-16-2022, 02:21 PM)clasher Wrote: So the idea with that left turn box is instead of just waiting for the green to make a standard left turn, you sit there and wait for another green to avoid crossing in front of the few cars and bikes that use Ontario street? If that is the purpose I would never use it. If I were on my bike and turning left I would signal my turn and wait next to that well placed and sunken manhole cover. RE: TEK Tower (30 Francis) | 45 fl | U/C - clasher - 11-16-2022 (11-16-2022, 02:50 PM)Chris Wrote:(11-16-2022, 02:21 PM)clasher Wrote: So the idea with that left turn box is instead of just waiting for the green to make a standard left turn, you sit there and wait for another green to avoid crossing in front of the few cars and bikes that use Ontario street? yeah I plan on just doing a normal left at that intersection. |