(01-24-2023, 07:14 PM)bravado Wrote: Call me paranoid but it's utter nonsense that The Record uses a picture of bike lanes when talking about capital expenses and "big ticket items".

(01-24-2023, 07:32 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:

(01-24-2023, 07:14 PM)bravado Wrote: Call me paranoid but it's utter nonsense that The Record uses a picture of bike lanes when talking about capital expenses and "big ticket items".

The top several road projects are probably each more expensive than all the bicycle projects put together.

(01-24-2023, 09:14 PM)ac3r Wrote: Hint: Stop reading that old rag, it's shite. Their main customer base are boomers, so of course half the stuff they publish is against anything "progressive" and modern.

(01-24-2023, 06:07 PM)Acitta Wrote:

(01-24-2023, 12:49 PM)SF22 Wrote: Thank you!! Feels pretty wild that the only bike parking at the entire mall is by the Walmart, though!

Even when you find a bike rack at a mall, it is usually the most useless kind, or sometimes there are a handful of post and rings. This Walmart is an exception.

(01-25-2023, 12:03 PM)SF22 Wrote:

(01-24-2023, 06:07 PM)Acitta Wrote: Even when you find a bike rack at a mall, it is usually the most useless kind, or sometimes there are a handful of post and rings. This Walmart is an exception.

Sounds like it's time for me to get my email-writing hands ready to bother all the local malls about their bike infrastructure. It boggles the mind that the city is putting all this work into the bike grid, and yet doesn't seem to be encouraging local businesses to install a couple spots of bike parking.

(01-24-2023, 10:01 PM)Acitta Wrote:

(01-24-2023, 09:14 PM)ac3r Wrote: Hint: Stop reading that old rag, it's shite. Their main customer base are boomers, so of course half the stuff they publish is against anything "progressive" and modern.

What do you have against boomers, kid?

(01-25-2023, 12:22 PM)ac3r Wrote:

(01-24-2023, 10:01 PM)Acitta Wrote: What do you have against boomers, kid?

Nothing? It's a very common figure of speech commonly used to illustrate stark differences in the mentality, needs, wants, goals and beliefs between generations. It is especially nascent now as younger demographics exist in a world that was, ultimately, unfathomable to people born in the baby boomer era (1940s-1950s). The priorities of older generations are much different than those of the now. Not always, but it is true in a lot of situations or even simply in the rhetoric.

Anyway, The Record is a bad paper, that's all that matters.

(01-25-2023, 07:33 PM)Acitta Wrote:

(01-25-2023, 12:22 PM)ac3r Wrote: Nothing? It's a very common figure of speech commonly used to illustrate stark differences in the mentality, needs, wants, goals and beliefs between generations. It is especially nascent now as younger demographics exist in a world that was, ultimately, unfathomable to people born in the baby boomer era (1940s-1950s). The priorities of older generations are much different than those of the now. Not always, but it is true in a lot of situations or even simply in the rhetoric.

Anyway, The Record is a bad paper, that's all that matters.

My only priority is economic survival.

(01-25-2023, 09:14 PM)ac3r Wrote:

(01-25-2023, 07:33 PM)Acitta Wrote: My only priority is economic survival.

Likewise, and for every citizen. That's a primary reason why many dislike how much power older generations have in or over decision making and influence in the media. All too often there is disregard to long term needs and goals of those still growing up (millennials to Gen Y) by those who were born decades prior. It's why people find so much absurdity in the fact the most powerful nation on this planet is run by an 80 year old man who can't walk up a flight of stairs without falling down or why mainstream media whether it is Fox News/CNN or local/hyperlocal stuff like TorStar/The Record holds. When a demographic so old holds so much power over the voting processes, journalism and the public discourse - be it over national/geopolitical affairs or something as local as bike lanes in Waterloo Region - it creates for a lot of disconnect. These are incredibly dire times for everyone right now.

This area of Canada has always been seen as progressive: it has 2 universities and a very reputable collage that hold prestige over the world, not to mention the plethora of tech companies (former BlackBerry, Google, Shopify etc) who dominate this planet be it search engines or unmanned drones and weapons (Aeryon, Colt Canada). It isn't really an ageist thing to point at older demographics for holding things back or stifling the rhetoric of discussion...it's just a reality. And even if you're older, that discontent shouldn't be seen as "ageist" unless IMO it's from the view of "why cannot other people of this older age bracket see the value in progressive policies?" Frankly, the majority here are progressive no matter when they were born otherwise you'd see more conservative policies in place preventing things, but we really seem to shine the spotlight on the older few that say No for some strange reason. I linked a The Record article in a thread regarding an Ainslie Street development that had the typical meme of the angry (usually old, white) people in local news meme treatment which is an actual phenomenon in journalistic media, not just a funny meme.

The Record likely wouldn't publish the content it does or hold the editorial slant it does if it had an equal balance of young voices on its editorial staff, right? But a few articles saying "This project will create too much traffic/too many shadows/overflow sewers" can totally derail a major project (i.e. Victoria & Park) whereas if younger people were given more encouragement to voice their opinions and chances to voice them, you'd probably find that project would have been approved with ease if we are to trust the democratic process. Instead, council listened to some tiny group of old home owners in the area who had "concerns" and cancelled hundreds of new homes when a 5 minute walk away you can find a few homeless shanty towns. It's stuff like that why people meme with "OK boomer" and it isn't meant to be offensive, but simply to point out the absurdity and urgency of things. That's why younger people communicate that way. Hopefully this doesn't seem irrelevant but I got temp banned on this forum not that long ago for linking to a meme that is run by academics and professionals who teach/work in some of the highest levels of architecture simply because people here failed to get the criticism and thought it was homophobic. As Dezeen writes, it's this sort of conversation that ampli[es] narratives that are excluded from architecture's official consensus so I don't want you to think I'm blaming old people (except when they are at fault hah...).

(01-25-2023, 09:29 PM)Acitta Wrote:

(01-25-2023, 09:14 PM)ac3r Wrote: Likewise, and for every citizen. That's a primary reason why many dislike how much power older generations have in or over decision making and influence in the media. All too often there is disregard to long term needs and goals of those still growing up (millennials to Gen Y) by those who were born decades prior. It's why people find so much absurdity in the fact the most powerful nation on this planet is run by an 80 year old man who can't walk up a flight of stairs without falling down or why mainstream media whether it is Fox News/CNN or local/hyperlocal stuff like TorStar/The Record holds. When a demographic so old holds so much power over the voting processes, journalism and the public discourse - be it over national/geopolitical affairs or something as local as bike lanes in Waterloo Region - it creates for a lot of disconnect. These are incredibly dire times for everyone right now.

This area of Canada has always been seen as progressive: it has 2 universities and a very reputable collage that hold prestige over the world, not to mention the plethora of tech companies (former BlackBerry, Google, Shopify etc) who dominate this planet be it search engines or unmanned drones and weapons (Aeryon, Colt Canada). It isn't really an ageist thing to point at older demographics for holding things back or stifling the rhetoric of discussion...it's just a reality. And even if you're older, that discontent shouldn't be seen as "ageist" unless IMO it's from the view of "why cannot other people of this older age bracket see the value in progressive policies?" Frankly, the majority here are progressive no matter when they were born otherwise you'd see more conservative policies in place preventing things, but we really seem to shine the spotlight on the older few that say No for some strange reason. I linked a The Record article in a thread regarding an Ainslie Street development that had the typical meme of the angry (usually old, white) people in local news meme treatment which is an actual phenomenon in journalistic media, not just a funny meme.

The Record likely wouldn't publish the content it does or hold the editorial slant it does if it had an equal balance of young voices on its editorial staff, right? But a few articles saying "This project will create too much traffic/too many shadows/overflow sewers" can totally derail a major project (i.e. Victoria & Park) whereas if younger people were given more encouragement to voice their opinions and chances to voice them, you'd probably find that project would have been approved with ease if we are to trust the democratic process. Instead, council listened to some tiny group of old home owners in the area who had "concerns" and cancelled hundreds of new homes when a 5 minute walk away you can find a few homeless shanty towns. It's stuff like that why people meme with "OK boomer" and it isn't meant to be offensive, but simply to point out the absurdity and urgency of things. That's why younger people communicate that way. Hopefully this doesn't seem irrelevant but I got temp banned on this forum not that long ago for linking to a meme that is run by academics and professionals who teach/work in some of the highest levels of architecture simply because people here failed to get the criticism and thought it was homophobic. As Dezeen writes, it's this sort of conversation that ampli[es] narratives that are excluded from architecture's official consensus so I don't want you to think I'm blaming old people (except when they are at fault hah...).

Well, as a 69-year-old boomer who has never owned any property or a car, I think that I share more opinions with the younger people on this forum than I do with the NIMBYs who complain about new developments.

(01-25-2023, 09:14 PM)ac3r Wrote: It's why people find so much absurdity in the fact the most powerful nation on this planet is run by an 80 year old man who can't walk up a flight of stairs without falling down or why mainstream media whether it is Fox News/CNN or local/hyperlocal stuff like TorStar/The Record holds.