Cycling in Waterloo Region - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: Cycling in Waterloo Region (/showthread.php?tid=186) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
|
RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - clasher - 01-25-2022 Google makes some weird choices for its cycling directions, I'm glad to hear someone is trying to make something better. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - KevinT - 01-25-2022 (01-25-2022, 09:54 AM)clasher Wrote: Google makes some weird choices for its cycling directions, I'm glad to hear someone is trying to make something better. Boy howdy. For at least the past year it refuses to believe that the bike lanes on Manitou can get you past the Bleams Rd round-about. The sidewalk becomes an MUT skirting it which the bike lanes ramp right on to, but Google is having none of it no matter how you drag and drop the suggested route. Edit to add: That limitation I know about so it's no big deal, but how many other compromises does it throw into my routes of which I'm completely unaware? RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - cherrypark - 01-25-2022 Great news about the efforts for building out the app. Not to negate their efforts, but really wish Transit App would take this as a next priority area to apply their UI and intermodal connections towards. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - danbrotherston - 01-25-2022 (01-25-2022, 11:33 AM)cherrypark Wrote: Great news about the efforts for building out the app. Not to negate their efforts, but really wish Transit App would take this as a next priority area to apply their UI and intermodal connections towards. I hear that this is actually up to GRT, who would need to pay the app's creators to make the app work better here (along with a branded version I assume). But I completely agree, Calgary's app was very good for this reason. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - ac3r - 02-10-2022 Kitchener’s Duke Street could be transformed to discourage cars, favour transit and cyclists: https://www.therecord.com/news/waterloo-region/2022/02/10/kitcheners-duke-street-could-be-transformed-to-discourage-cars-favour-transit-and-cyclists.html EngageWR link: https://www.engagewr.ca/hub-page/regionofwaterloo RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - jeffster - 02-11-2022 (02-10-2022, 10:51 AM)ac3r Wrote: Kitchener’s Duke Street could be transformed to discourage cars, favour transit and cyclists: https://www.therecord.com/news/waterloo-region/2022/02/10/kitcheners-duke-street-could-be-transformed-to-discourage-cars-favour-transit-and-cyclists.html Good idea, this is a redundant road at this point. Or close it off entirely between Frederick and College -- to make a pedestrian plaza -- if possible. D&O garage would be the biggest challenge. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - danbrotherston - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 02:37 AM)jeffster Wrote:(02-10-2022, 10:51 AM)ac3r Wrote: Kitchener’s Duke Street could be transformed to discourage cars, favour transit and cyclists: https://www.therecord.com/news/waterloo-region/2022/02/10/kitcheners-duke-street-could-be-transformed-to-discourage-cars-favour-transit-and-cyclists.html I had a much more negative take on it: (02-10-2022, 04:09 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: ... FWIW...I agree, I would love it to be be pedestrianized (the whole downtown really), but I think there are a significant number of driveways which need access maintained, some have other accesses, but ones like the Ontario garage don't. But I think the region is also concerned with transit, like I said, they COULD free up a lane by having buses use the LRT right of way, but they claim that's "impossible". I'm so tired of regional engineers claiming it is "impossible" to prioritize anything but cars (and transit). RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - ijmorlan - 02-11-2022 What about just making it one way? Not as the 3-lane semi-highway it was back when we had the one way system, but a single lane? Then the other direction can become a separated 2-way cycle track. OOPS: I just noticed this is Dan’s proposal. Anyway, I approve Dan’s message, and I’m sorry to see him leaving. We need more advocates for better transportation infrastructure. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - danbrotherston - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 11:51 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: What about just making it one way? Not as the 3-lane semi-highway it was back when we had the one way system, but a single lane? Then the other direction can become a separated 2-way cycle track. Making it one way would involve redirecting one direction of several frequent bus routes, which is what regional engineers don't want to do. I argue that they could solve this by using the LRT right of way for the other direction of buses, but apparently that's "impossible". RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - Bytor - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 11:57 AM)danbrotherston Wrote:(02-11-2022, 11:51 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: What about just making it one way? Not as the 3-lane semi-highway it was back when we had the one way system, but a single lane? Then the other direction can become a separated 2-way cycle track. Our system is not designed as a street car and the tram drivers are not trained as that. Further, the unreliability of busses thanks to congestion makes it difficult to run them in between trams with even a 15 minute headway and significantly more and more so as you decrease that window. You don't make the buses routes any more efficient or reliable, you just make the trams less so. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - danbrotherston - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 01:13 PM)Bytor Wrote:(02-11-2022, 11:57 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Making it one way would involve redirecting one direction of several frequent bus routes, which is what regional engineers don't want to do. I argue that they could solve this by using the LRT right of way for the other direction of buses, but apparently that's "impossible". We're talking about a 4 block segment, the delay and congestion would be minimal, and tram drivers can be trained to not run into buses that happen to be parallel to their route rather than perpendicular. The LRT is running by driver operation on this segment, not using ATP or whatever train control system they have in place, so the LRT can follow a bus. None of these objections are remotely impossible or even difficult to overcome, meaning it is a choice not to prioritize cycling. If the region actually felt that cycling was important, they could make this work, but since they don't, they aren't going to do so. And I'll point out again, if cycling WAS successful, it would mean significant delays for the buses, but because the region doesn't believe cycling will be successful they don't care, and more, because of their choice to refuse to invest in cycling, they will probably ensure cycling doesn't ever see significantly more traffic. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - ijmorlan - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 01:13 PM)Bytor Wrote:(02-11-2022, 11:57 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Making it one way would involve redirecting one direction of several frequent bus routes, which is what regional engineers don't want to do. I argue that they could solve this by using the LRT right of way for the other direction of buses, but apparently that's "impossible". I think our tram drivers are sufficiently trained to know not to run into a bus on the right-of-way. The idea that a transit lane can’t handle more than one route or more than one vehicle every several minutes is nonsense. I would be concerned if there were a bus stop that required the bus to stop on the tracks; that would at a minimum require careful consideration and is not ideal. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - danbrotherston - 02-12-2022 Here is a question for you folks... How would you be responding to a proposal where our main downtown cycle grid will use shared bus/bike lanes? Because this is exactly what is being proposed for Duke St. It's amazing what a little framing will do. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - ijmorlan - 02-12-2022 (02-12-2022, 01:11 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: Here is a question for you folks... It’s obviously no good for either. Buses will get held up by bicycles, and many bicyclists will feel rushed or unsafe. Although I think you were right when you said the actual plan is effectively just not to accommodate bicycles and keep bicycle traffic to a hardcore minority. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - danbrotherston - 02-12-2022 (02-12-2022, 01:15 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(02-12-2022, 01:11 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: Here is a question for you folks... Yeah, I think that's the regional plan. I mean, whether they think its the intention, or whether they just don't believe cycling is a thing that will happen (and so create self fulfilling prophecies) I don't know. I first encountered this when I was part of the Moving Forward 2020 plan...where they said that their modeling showed that even if they built a huge protected, comprehensive, and connected network they wouldn't get significant usage....I asked them how their modeling worked and they, completely seriously explained that it's based on what uptick in cycling they get from building one disconnected, mediocre piece of infra. It was around that point, I realized that talking to staff was pointless. But I was actually talking about the response to this. I know several cycling advocates who are positioning this as a win. I think they feel this is the best we can get, which frankly, I think is silly, we should aim higher. But I think it's also a little bit about the positioning. If this was positioned as a bus/bike lane, how much worse would it be received by the public. |