Waterloo Region Connected
City Centre/Young Condominiums | 17, 25 & 6 fl | U/C - Printable Version

+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Land Development and Real Estate (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Urban Areas (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: City Centre/Young Condominiums | 17, 25 & 6 fl | U/C (/showthread.php?tid=16)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47


RE: City Centre/Young Condominiums | 67 & 46 m | 17 & 12 fl | U/C - panamaniac - 01-10-2019

(01-10-2019, 08:57 PM)PassTheBruce Wrote: What does LPAT mean?

Local Planning Appeal Tribunal - formerly known as the OMB.


RE: City Centre/Young Condominiums | 67 & 46 m | 17 & 12 fl | U/C - Momo26 - 01-10-2019

Yes but why?


RE: City Centre/Young Condominiums | 67 & 46 m | 17 & 12 fl | U/C - panamaniac - 01-10-2019

And by whom? The notice is quite uninformative.


RE: City Centre/Young Condominiums | 67 & 46 m | 17 & 12 fl | U/C - rangersfan - 01-17-2019

I was wondering why Andrin had not submitted building permits to the city for Young Condos ahead of the February exemption deadline, but this appeal to LPAT might have interfered? If so the project could be more expensive than planned to build.


RE: City Centre/Young Condominiums | 67 & 46 m | 17 & 12 fl | U/C - jeffster - 01-17-2019

(01-17-2019, 07:00 AM)rangersfan Wrote: I was wondering why Andrin had not submitted building permits to the city for Young Condos ahead of the February exemption deadline, but this appeal to LPAT might have interfered? If so the project could be more expensive than planned to build.

I'd imagine anything like that would be retro to the initial application for permit.

And yeah, who's complaining? This has been in the planning for over a decade.


RE: City Centre/Young Condominiums | 67 & 46 m | 17 & 12 fl | U/C - Spokes - 01-17-2019

Seriously, phase two is of no surprise to anyone. And what would there be to complain about??


RE: City Centre/Young Condominiums | 67 & 46 m | 17 & 12 fl | U/C - Rainrider22 - 01-17-2019

(01-17-2019, 09:34 AM)Spokes Wrote: Seriously, phase two is of no surprise to anyone.  And what would there be to complain about??

Change in height ?  maybe ?  Like you said, what else could it possibly be ?


RE: City Centre/Young Condominiums | 67 & 46 m | 17 & 12 fl | U/C - Spokes - 01-17-2019

How much higher is it than originally planned?


RE: City Centre/Young Condominiums | 67 & 46 m | 17 & 12 fl | U/C - Lens - 01-17-2019

[Image: Picture21.png]

About twice as tall since the original was around 11 floors I think


RE: City Centre/Young Condominiums | 67 & 46 m | 17 & 12 fl | U/C - Momo26 - 01-17-2019

Could they be asking for extension to development fee exemption? From what I hear, they are having a heck of a hard time selling these units.


RE: City Centre/Young Condominiums | 67 & 46 m | 17 & 12 fl | U/C - Spokes - 01-17-2019

(01-17-2019, 12:27 PM)Momo26 Wrote: Could they be asking for extension to development fee exemption? From what I hear, they are having a heck of a hard time selling these units.

That wouldn't be an LPAT thing though would it?


RE: City Centre/Young Condominiums | 67 & 46 m | 17 & 12 fl | U/C - GtwoK - 01-17-2019

(01-17-2019, 12:26 PM)Lens Wrote: [Image: Picture21.png]

About twice as tall since the original was around 11 floors I think

Woah. whats this from? Is it old / inaccurate?


RE: City Centre/Young Condominiums | 67 & 46 m | 17 & 12 fl | U/C - Momo26 - 01-17-2019

That picture is grossly outdated. Disregard.


RE: City Centre/Young Condominiums | 67 & 46 m | 17 & 12 fl | U/C - Lens - 01-17-2019

Not really, it's pretty much the same massing as the updated one (couldn't find it before)


 [Image: Centre+Block_Quadrangle+website+-+Copy.jpg]

[Image: 41afe6b312e5551a518a295e1dee0a40.jpg]

[Image: Centre+Block_Quadrangle+website.jpg]


More here:http://www.golbourad.com/portfolio/#/new-gallery-1/ with images of the courtyard park that will probably never get built  Sad


RE: City Centre/Young Condominiums | 67 & 46 m | 17 & 12 fl | U/C - taylortbb - 01-17-2019

All three of those are the same, but they're all old now. They did a total redesign of tower 2, and it's now taller than tower 1 and set closer to Duke than King.