Waterloo Region Connected
ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version

+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Pheidippides - 10-09-2017

Obviously the region and Scherer property owners disagree what fair market value it, but at this point in time it comes across as anti-everything-that's-not-a-single-occupancy-vehicle.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - darts - 10-09-2017

(10-09-2017, 07:17 PM)Pheidippides Wrote: Obviously the region and Scherer property owners disagree what fair market value it, but at this point in time it comes across as anti-everything-that's-not-a-single-occupancy-vehicle.

how does it come across as that? I didn't think they have actually outlined what their position is.  They probably would resist equally if the region was looking to take their land to add another lane.

They may be interested in trying to keep as much land as possible since it won't be replaced and losing land  now will hurt resale value in the future when they want to turn it into a 50 storey building  with some park space and storm water managment pond.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 10-09-2017

(10-09-2017, 08:59 PM)darts Wrote:
(10-09-2017, 07:17 PM)Pheidippides Wrote: Obviously the region and Scherer property owners disagree what fair market value it, but at this point in time it comes across as anti-everything-that's-not-a-single-occupancy-vehicle.

how does it come across as that? I didn't think they have actually outlined what their position is.  They probably would resist equally if the region was looking to take their land to add another lane.

They may be interested in trying to keep as much land as possible since it won't be replaced and losing land  now will hurt resale value in the future when they want to turn it into a 50 storey building  with some park space and storm water managment pond.

Given that the negotiations have dragged on for over 15 months and the region now feels that they need to resort to expropriation, I do expect they have outlined their position to the region (if not to us) -- and the region cannot accept that position.

So the time for talking seems to be over and the land will now be expropriated, without any further negotiation.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - darts - 10-09-2017

(10-09-2017, 10:41 PM)tomh009 Wrote:
(10-09-2017, 08:59 PM)darts Wrote: how does it come across as that? I didn't think they have actually outlined what their position is.  They probably would resist equally if the region was looking to take their land to add another lane.

They may be interested in trying to keep as much land as possible since it won't be replaced and losing land  now will hurt resale value in the future when they want to turn it into a 50 storey building  with some park space and storm water managment pond.

Given that the negotiations have dragged on for over 15 months and the region now feels that they need to resort to expropriation, I do expect they have outlined their position to the region (if not to us) -- and the region cannot accept that position.

So the time for talking seems to be over and the land will now be expropriated, without any further negotiation.

But I don't see how 15 months of negotiations equals "but at this point in time it comes across as anti-everything-that's-not-a-single-occupancy-vehicle."


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Pheidippides - 10-10-2017

You are correct that there is nothing about the situation that implies that there is any other motive at work.

I guess I am guilty of projecting my bias(es) on to the situation. Thanks for pointing that out to me. I apologize for implying that. It could be any number of reasons (perceived unfair market value, Libertarianism, other, no reason at all, etc.).

Expropriation sucks for the owner, and put in the same situation and circumstances I may have ended up doing the exact same thing of fighting to the bitter end.

It still strikes me as odd though that once the writing was on the wall that someone would rather spend money on lawyer's fees to get the same price (effectively reducing the "profit") over a sliver of land that functionally doesn't really change the rest of the property than to move on with their life unless they were trying to make a point, what-ever that may be, especially when "fair market value" in the last 15 months would have been higher than ever before thanks to the recent real-estate cycle.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Viewfromthe42 - 10-10-2017

If you have lived around that intersection during rush hour, you will have noticed that cars turning from Caroline NB/SB onto Erb St EB/WB don't follow their lanes very well. In each direction, cars will turn illegally wide, cutting the throughput by half or more. When it's turning EB, both sides can complete their turn on the red and aren't in the intersection as much to block anything, but when a left-turning to-WB-Erb car gets caught, it can jam the whole intersection. Since people haven't smartened up about that intersection, even without LRT, I wouldn't be opposed to removing the left due to the traffic issues it causes. Now, Caroline is the primary supply for Erb from the North, and FDB from the south, splitting the loading a bit better.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 10-10-2017

(10-10-2017, 08:46 AM)Viewfromthe42 Wrote: If you have lived around that intersection during rush hour, you will have noticed that cars turning from Caroline NB/SB onto Erb St EB/WB don't follow their lanes very well. In each direction, cars will turn illegally wide, cutting the throughput by half or more. When it's turning EB, both sides can complete their turn on the red and aren't in the intersection as much to block anything, but when a left-turning to-WB-Erb car gets caught, it can jam the whole intersection. Since people haven't smartened up about that intersection, even without LRT, I wouldn't be opposed to removing the left due to the traffic issues it causes. Now, Caroline is the primary supply for Erb from the North, and FDB from the south, splitting the loading a bit better.

As far as I can tell, hardly anybody knows that they can turn left SB->EB on a red. They just sit there waiting.

Of course, the whole mess could be hugely simplified by eliminating SB straight-through traffic (turn left at FDB), right turns from Erb (turn right at FDB), and right turns NB->EB (use FDB), as well as left turns NB->WB (use FDB). Then the intersection of Caroline and FDB just becomes a bend in the road, except for a driveway to Waterloo Town Square, and Erb and Caroline reduces to a place where the road crosses the tracks (plus the left turn SB->EB, which could just yield to Erb St. traffic). Of course the intersection at FDB would need minor upgrades, in particular more left turn lanes, but there is space for that.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 10-10-2017

(10-10-2017, 09:33 AM)ijmorlan Wrote:
(10-10-2017, 08:46 AM)Viewfromthe42 Wrote: If you have lived around that intersection during rush hour, you will have noticed that cars turning from Caroline NB/SB onto Erb St EB/WB don't follow their lanes very well. In each direction, cars will turn illegally wide, cutting the throughput by half or more. When it's turning EB, both sides can complete their turn on the red and aren't in the intersection as much to block anything, but when a left-turning to-WB-Erb car gets caught, it can jam the whole intersection. Since people haven't smartened up about that intersection, even without LRT, I wouldn't be opposed to removing the left due to the traffic issues it causes. Now, Caroline is the primary supply for Erb from the North, and FDB from the south, splitting the loading a bit better.

As far as I can tell, hardly anybody knows that they can turn left SB->EB on a red. They just sit there waiting.

Of course, the whole mess could be hugely simplified by eliminating SB straight-through traffic (turn left at FDB), right turns from Erb (turn right at FDB), and right turns NB->EB (use FDB), as well as left turns NB->WB (use FDB). Then the intersection of Caroline and FDB just becomes a bend in the road, except for a driveway to Waterloo Town Square, and Erb and Caroline reduces to a place where the road crosses the tracks (plus the left turn SB->EB, which could just yield to Erb St. traffic). Of course the intersection at FDB would need minor upgrades, in particular more left turn lanes, but there is space for that.

That left turn used to be allowed and some people made it.  Now I am not sure of the legality because of the bike box.  It is probably still legal because bike boxes aren't really in the HTA, but it makes people think twice about it.  I don't think that's a common turning movement.

The two biggest improvements they could make at that intersection would be to expand the corner island so that it blocks one lane, and make the right turn channel a direct turn into the lane instead of a merge.  The second would be to make the right turn lane a dedicated signal that only changes to permit trail traffic through (since there would be no other conflicting traffic movements).


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - kitborn - 10-10-2017

(10-08-2017, 06:37 PM)KevinL Wrote: Maybe they need to put up one of those big electronic text signs at the side of the road there, have it flash 'NO LEFT TURNS / EXCEPT BUSES'. Leave it there for a week or two, hopefully get the message across.

You have to see the turn lanes for buses only at Highland Hills Mall to realize that they do not work. People use them all the time.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - urbd - 10-10-2017

Ok great discussion about all sorts of left turns in the Region but can we get back on topic to ION? Unless there's nothing else to talk about, we can continue analyzing left turns.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - NotStan - 10-10-2017

(10-10-2017, 11:35 AM)kitborn Wrote:
(10-08-2017, 06:37 PM)KevinL Wrote: Maybe they need to put up one of those big electronic text signs at the side of the road there, have it flash 'NO LEFT TURNS / EXCEPT BUSES'. Leave it there for a week or two, hopefully get the message across.

You have to see the turn lanes for buses only at Highland Hills Mall to realize that they do not work. People use them all the time.

There's a difference in knowingly breaking the law as at Highland Hills Mall and inadvertently doing so at Caroline & Erb because the signage is so poor. 
Why don't they put up a camera at HH Mall and snap all the violaters and ticket them?


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 10-10-2017

(10-10-2017, 12:26 PM)NotStan Wrote:
(10-10-2017, 11:35 AM)kitborn Wrote: You have to see the turn lanes for buses only at Highland Hills Mall to realize that they do not work. People use them all the time.

There's a difference in knowingly breaking the law as at Highland Hills Mall and inadvertently doing so at Caroline & Erb because the signage is so poor. 
Why don't they put up a camera at HH Mall and snap all the violaters and ticket them?

I want to know what the effect would be if the signal only went green for buses. Right now I think it is marked as being a transit signal (and there is a pair of them, because we know lights are so unreliable that it just wouldn’t work to have single signals…), but I think it turns green on every cycle, not just when a bus arrives. In other words, would people run a red to take the turn? And now thinking about the legal authorization for the cameras, I know we have red light cameras, so it should be possible to use them there, whether or not using cameras to enforce restricted lanes would be permitted.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 10-10-2017

(10-10-2017, 10:25 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: That left turn used to be allowed and some people made it.  Now I am not sure of the legality because of the bike box.  It is probably still legal because bike boxes aren't really in the HTA, but it makes people think twice about it.  I don't think that's a common turning movement.

The two biggest improvements they could make at that intersection would be to expand the corner island so that it blocks one lane, and make the right turn channel a direct turn into the lane instead of a merge.  The second would be to make the right turn lane a dedicated signal that only changes to permit trail traffic through (since there would be no other conflicting traffic movements).

I’ve looked carefully for a “no left on red” and it’s not there, so as far as I can see the turn should be permitted, although I agree the (somewhat weird) bike box probably makes people think otherwise (maybe even correctly, non-expert here). By not common, do you mean it’s not common to turn left on a red, or that particular left turn is uncommon? Because when I go by on a typical cycle there is a small lineup of multiple cars waiting to turn. I wouldn’t call it congested but it’s more than the occasional vehicle. Legal left on red is uncommon in this city but very common in places like Calgary with a one-way street grid downtown.

I agree entirely with your proposed improvements (as a more likely outcome in lieu of my idea to almost entirely eliminate the intersection). When the snow comes a large area of road that clearly doesn’t need to be road is made visible. Due to the position of the tracks, I don’t think the turn can be channelized quite as well as one might hope, but I agree that it would help to make it clearer to people turning right that they aren’t really merging with anything.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 10-10-2017

(10-10-2017, 02:42 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:
(10-10-2017, 10:25 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: That left turn used to be allowed and some people made it.  Now I am not sure of the legality because of the bike box.  It is probably still legal because bike boxes aren't really in the HTA, but it makes people think twice about it.  I don't think that's a common turning movement.

The two biggest improvements they could make at that intersection would be to expand the corner island so that it blocks one lane, and make the right turn channel a direct turn into the lane instead of a merge.  The second would be to make the right turn lane a dedicated signal that only changes to permit trail traffic through (since there would be no other conflicting traffic movements).

I’ve looked carefully for a “no left on red” and it’s not there, so as far as I can see the turn should be permitted, although I agree the (somewhat weird) bike box probably makes people think otherwise (maybe even correctly, non-expert here). By not common, do you mean it’s not common to turn left on a red, or that particular left turn is uncommon? Because when I go by on a typical cycle there is a small lineup of multiple cars waiting to turn. I wouldn’t call it congested but it’s more than the occasional vehicle. Legal left on red is uncommon in this city but very common in places like Calgary with a one-way street grid downtown.

I agree entirely with your proposed improvements (as a more likely outcome in lieu of my idea to almost entirely eliminate the intersection). When the snow comes a large area of road that clearly doesn’t need to be road is made visible. Due to the position of the tracks, I don’t think the turn can be channelized quite as well as one might hope, but I agree that it would help to make it clearer to people turning right that they aren’t really merging with anything.

I actually meant that it doesn't carry a high volume of traffic.  I wouldn't judge by the traffic right now, because King is closed everything is messed up.  At least before LRT construction started, I don't think it was a common movement.  It's basically turning around, only drivers coming down Albert who wanted to go west would use it I think.  That being said, I have no idea how common it will be going forward with all the changes around.

The left on red is an unusual turn as well, most drivers are not aware of when it's legal (or don't realize that they are in that situation at that location).

Yes, the 'sneckdowns' at that intersection are particularly spectacular Smile.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Markster - 10-10-2017

I always loved making that left-on-red from Caroline to Erb! But yes, a lot of cars don't realize you can do it.