(03-09-2023, 02:30 PM)ac3r Wrote:

(03-09-2023, 08:28 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: That is infeasible. You talk about grade separation as if it’s a minor tweak to the design, like having heated platforms. It’s not.

And in any case, it makes no sense to spend a huge amount of money grade separating the system to save one life per year (or whatever; probably not even that many) when you could save many more lives by building more LRT lines similar to the one we have and getting more traffic out of cars.

More fundamentally, you cannot make the world safe. There are situations in which one can feasibly eliminate classes of hazard. For example, machinery that takes both hands to activate, ensuring that one does not accidentally amputate ones other hand. There are other situations where similar preventive measures are either infeasible or outright impossible.

Here is your mental gymnastics award: http://www.americare-health.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/award.jpg

There is nothing "infeasible" about designing a rapid transit system to be as safe as it possibly can be to prevent accidents and death as often as possible. Not sure why you would attempt to argue otherwise. As it stands, the LRT essentially has no real safety features to prevent collisions (whether it is with a vehicle or individual) other than putting the burden of not getting maimed or killed on the victim rather than a technology whose safety essentially boils down to a loud horn and "please stay off tracks" signage due to the region and tax payers being too damn cheap. Look what that has got us...a guarantee for a lifetime of endless collisions and deaths because there's no tweaking it. It's built already and it was built poorly.

While I realize even if you elevated the entire thing or built it as a light metro you could and still likely would inevitably have an incident, that's just the nature of things, you cannot make the argument that it's just not worth the money to save lives or to treat it like a simple numbers game like "well who cares if one kid possibly dies, saving their life is just not worth the money for good design and it was their fault for crossing; we should also build more LRT lines so less cars hit people too." What kind of reasoning is that?

(03-09-2023, 11:21 AM)bravado Wrote: There’s all sorts of local trams right at ground level across the world. Is this a uniquely bad design in KW or just the unfortunate growing pains period?

I don’t go downtown much, but in terms of safety I was shocked by how many kids were crammed on the 1m wide sidewalk in front of KCI. Why aren’t our streets designed for the modes that actually move the most people?

(03-09-2023, 02:23 PM)bravado Wrote: I think we have a responsibility to design around human behaviour, and to me it seems like excessive space for cars is what’s causing the LRT and pedestrian space to not be as safe as they could be.

(03-09-2023, 02:50 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:

(03-09-2023, 02:23 PM)bravado Wrote: I think we have a responsibility to design around human behaviour, and to me it seems like excessive space for cars is what’s causing the LRT and pedestrian space to not be as safe as they could be.

This is exactly on point...why isn't the crossing in front of the school? Well because it's where the other road is...pedestrians (which far outnumber cars at that intersection are not the prioritized user.

Hell, pedestrians aren't even the prioritized vehicle AT LRT STATIONS!

(03-10-2023, 01:32 AM)ijmorlan Wrote:

(03-09-2023, 02:50 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: This is exactly on point...why isn't the crossing in front of the school? Well because it's where the other road is...pedestrians (which far outnumber cars at that intersection are not the prioritized user.

Hell, pedestrians aren't even the prioritized vehicle AT LRT STATIONS!

What are you talking about? The crossing at the traffic light is precisely in front of the main entrance:

https://goo.gl/maps/yosxfDy6K6S8QTr88

I don’t see how it could be more appropriately situated.

Now if you want to argue that the Betzner Ave. sidewalk should be extended to Charles and a crossing installed there, or that there should be a crossing at Pandora, we would have something to discuss. Where do you think the pedestrian crossing should be?

In most places, road intersections are the proper place for pedestrian crossings anyway, because the pedestrian routes crossing the street are sidewalks on intersecting streets.

(03-10-2023, 02:52 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Yeah, sorry, my bad. I had confused the configuration up at KCI, which also has a very narrow uncomfortable sidewalk...even more so I think.

As for Cameron Heights, yes, they are lined up. As for where crossings should be....they should be where pedestrians need and want to cross regardless of roads. Usually they follow roads because we rarely consider transportation routes without cars.

(03-09-2023, 03:06 PM)neonjoe Wrote: It's also a tradeoff of the ability for emergency vehicles to enter the ROW. Otherwise we could have made the LRT median a bit less penetrable if they had used some sort of fence. This would essentially 'grade separate' the LRT except at intersections.

(03-12-2023, 09:38 PM)ac3r Wrote: It mAkEs nO SeNsE To sPeNd a hUgE AmOuNt oF MoNeY GrAdE SePaRaTiNg tHe sYsTeM To sAvE OnE LiFe pEr yEaR

Glad to hear the kid who got struck survived. Sad to hear there has nonetheless been an additional fatality. Hopefully Keolis/RoW has some good therapy services available for the LRV operators for what is going to be an inevitably long term problem: minimal safety, constant accidents and deaths every so often.

(03-13-2023, 07:49 AM)ijmorlan Wrote:

(03-12-2023, 09:38 PM)ac3r Wrote: It mAkEs nO SeNsE To sPeNd a hUgE AmOuNt oF MoNeY GrAdE SePaRaTiNg tHe sYsTeM To sAvE OnE LiFe pEr yEaR

Glad to hear the kid who got struck survived. Sad to hear there has nonetheless been an additional fatality. Hopefully Keolis/RoW has some good therapy services available for the LRV operators for what is going to be an inevitably long term problem: minimal safety, constant accidents and deaths every so often.

Why are you hyper-focussed on a tiny amount of death and injury related to the LRT? Why aren’t you agitating for grade-separating all our major car routes? Even if we did suddenly get a bunch of extra money, grade-separating the LRT wouldn’t save as many lives as a lot of other ways I can think of spending the money. Why is this so hard to understand? And why are you doing tHaT tHiNg with the capitalization? Could it be that you have no rational response to what I’m saying?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jFqhjaGh30

(03-13-2023, 08:02 AM)ac3r Wrote: Why are you okay with a faulty transit system? That relatedly fails in the winter, gets into accidents all the time and which has maimed a child and taken two human lives and traumatized the people who operate the trains as well as the individuals who have been in accidents or have lost loved ones?

What's so hard about admitting that it's faulty and should have been designed better so as to avoid this?

This isn't a "tiny amount of death and injury", it's regular occurrence. Dozens of accidents, two deaths and junk trains that can't handle a bit of freezing rain. You can't pretend it isn't if you want but it doesn't change the reality. And pointing at the obvious fact that road vehicles kill more people is meaningless. Of course they do because there's more of them, but the issue here is faulty trains and poor safety.