Waterloo Region Connected
ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version

+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - trainspotter139 - 01-20-2022

(01-20-2022, 01:42 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:
(01-20-2022, 01:37 PM)Bytor Wrote: I half-heartedly tried to google this but I couldn't find an answer:

Do we know how reliable our Flexity Freedom trams have been?

They weren't properly finished and had a to have a bunch of work done to enable ATC and things, but that's not reliability. Neither is car drivers turning in their paths. The frame welding issue doesn't make them, less reliable now, only 10+ years in the future.

Have there been any news reports on tram reliability?

I've not seen any reports.

But we don't have a lot of spares, if they had reliability issues, we'd be seeing service issues.

From this article in the Record:
Quote:The Bombardier trains are proving to be very reliable, Galloway said, unlike the LRT system in Ottawa, which uses cars built by French builder Alstom, and which has been plagued with delays and problems, prompting a provincial inquiry.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ac3r - 01-20-2022

That feel when, going forward, everything Bombardier will just be rebranded Alstom equipment. For what it's worth, though, Alstom does make good stuff, from high speed rail EMU/DMUs to subway cars to light rail vehicles. For whatever reason, the Citadis Spirit LRVs were just poorly designed, which is odd, because Citadis streetcars are used all over the world so the technology isn't all that different.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - mgregorasz - 01-21-2022

(01-19-2022, 06:30 PM)jeffster Wrote:
(01-19-2022, 06:14 PM)Bytor Wrote: The same way they do it in DTK. Tractors with blowers and a dump truck following them.

In heavy snow fall pull out the secondary plan book which moves priorities around. It tells the snowplow operators to not cover that stretch of Ottawa street, and takes one of the tractor/dump truck teams from DTK to clear that stretch of Ottawa St. When done, they go back to DTK. No extra equipment needed, just a rejigging of priorities.

Yes, more snow than usual causes problems, but it can still be planned for and to not do so is, to put it bluntly, incompetence.

This problem though would appear to be a regional or GRT/Grandlinq issue, not City of Kitchener. I'm not even sure if the city would be allowed to do snow removal on those tracts.

Either way, hopefully something was learned from this snow event.

From what I've read in the maintenance agreement that Kitchener has with the Region, Kitchener is responsible for removing the windrows from adjacent LRT tracks.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - mgregorasz - 01-21-2022

(01-19-2022, 05:58 PM)Bytor Wrote:
(01-19-2022, 01:30 AM)trainspotter139 Wrote: Maybe the City/Region should invest in a couple of wing plow trailers for the single track sections ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

No. Just make better plans.

For example, when weather warning like this come out switch do a different set of priorities. Normally a bit of snow dumped on an LRT track by a snowplow doesn't matter because rail vehicles can handle snow better than rubber-tired road vehicles, but there is still such a thing as "too much".

When the warnings come out, put away the "Regular Snowfall Plan" book and get out the "Heavy Snowfall Plan" book.

First, add a refinement to the three priority tiers of when roads get cleared that now the drivers must stick to predefined routes which leaves off the side of Ottawa St. where the tracks are so nobody plows too much snow onto the tracks that would get the trams stuck. Humans make mistakes and somebody might forget because they are used to a plowing routine, so instead of blaming them we give them the tools they need to not make a mistake. In this case, a GPS device and a predefined route around their sector that omits the part that needs special/different care.

Second, take one of the tractor+blower & dump truck pairs off of DTK duty and send it down to clear that part of Ottawa St. When done it can head back to help in DTK. Send it back to Ottawa St. as often as a snowplow would go through.

Voila, alternate plan for snowfall that doesn't require more equipment.

Municipalities should have alternate plans made up for these occasional "once in 20 year" events, and to not have them is simply incompetence.

I'm willing to bet that the "Heavy Snowfall Plan" would look exactly the same as the "Regular Snowfall Plan". There is no need for municipalities to have multiple snow removal plans for different type of storms when the only thing that changes is the amount of snow that needs to be cleared. In the case of the part of Ottawa St. that has the adjacent LRT track, Kitchener could either:
A) Get the plow operators that run that route to go as slow as possible (without getting stuck) so that the windrow doesn't get spread all over the tracks
or
B) Have a 4 x4 pickup truck with a plow run down the LRT tracks right behind the road plow to push snow back towards the windrow and tighten it up.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - jeffster - 01-22-2022

(01-21-2022, 07:26 PM)mgregorasz Wrote:
(01-19-2022, 06:30 PM)jeffster Wrote: This problem though would appear to be a regional or GRT/Grandlinq issue, not City of Kitchener. I'm not even sure if the city would be allowed to do snow removal on those tracts.

Either way, hopefully something was learned from this snow event.

From what I've read in the maintenance agreement that Kitchener has with the Region, Kitchener is responsible for removing the windrows from adjacent LRT tracks.

That's good to know. That said, one of the vehicles that I saw stuck wasn't a result of plowing roads, there was simply too much snow on the track, and it looked like it was never cleared at all (Kitchener Market Station).

Good think we don't get a lot of large dumps around her. Not like it used to be around here anyway.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - jeffster - 01-22-2022

(01-21-2022, 08:01 PM)mgregorasz Wrote:
(01-19-2022, 05:58 PM)Bytor Wrote: No. Just make better plans.

For example, when weather warning like this come out switch do a different set of priorities. Normally a bit of snow dumped on an LRT track by a snowplow doesn't matter because rail vehicles can handle snow better than rubber-tired road vehicles, but there is still such a thing as "too much".

When the warnings come out, put away the "Regular Snowfall Plan" book and get out the "Heavy Snowfall Plan" book.

First, add a refinement to the three priority tiers of when roads get cleared that now the drivers must stick to predefined routes which leaves off the side of Ottawa St. where the tracks are so nobody plows too much snow onto the tracks that would get the trams stuck. Humans make mistakes and somebody might forget because they are used to a plowing routine, so instead of blaming them we give them the tools they need to not make a mistake. In this case, a GPS device and a predefined route around their sector that omits the part that needs special/different care.

Second, take one of the tractor+blower & dump truck pairs off of DTK duty and send it down to clear that part of Ottawa St. When done it can head back to help in DTK. Send it back to Ottawa St. as often as a snowplow would go through.

Voila, alternate plan for snowfall that doesn't require more equipment.

Municipalities should have alternate plans made up for these occasional "once in 20 year" events, and to not have them is simply incompetence.

I'm willing to bet that the "Heavy Snowfall Plan" would look exactly the same as the "Regular Snowfall Plan". There is no need for municipalities to have multiple snow removal plans for different type of storms when the only thing that changes is the amount of snow that needs to be cleared. In the case of the part of Ottawa St. that has the adjacent LRT track, Kitchener could either:
A) Get the plow operators that run that route to go as slow as possible (without getting stuck) so that the windrow doesn't get spread all over the tracks
or
B) Have a 4 x4 pickup truck with a plow run down the LRT tracks right behind the road plow to push snow back towards the windrow and tighten it up.

I actually thought that this is what they had. You could have 2 4x4 Ford F350's running down the tracks to clear it (maybe 30 minutes to do so?). Unsure if they could be given priority like the LRT, if the technology is there. Then also, they could act as a lead throughout the day, until things are cleared enough for the trains to operator on their own.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - clasher - 01-22-2022

Just couple one of these plows to the front of the train:
[Image: IMG_0596.JPG]

The Grand River Railway had a very similar plow they used way back in the day but I can't find the old site that had all the specific GRR pics on it.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 01-22-2022

(01-21-2022, 08:01 PM)mgregorasz Wrote: I'm willing to bet that the "Heavy Snowfall Plan" would look exactly the same as the "Regular Snowfall Plan". There is no need for municipalities to have multiple snow removal plans for different type of storms when the only thing that changes is the amount of snow that needs to be cleared.

Actually I can see the amount of snow making a significant difference. If it’s very heavy, you need to be removing it from some areas entirely because there is just too much all in one place. If it’s medium, this isn’t needed. If it’s very light, you might not even need to do anything on roads because the action of cars will just melt it in place; and sidewalks might be better done with brushes than with shovels in this condition. You also need to consider how long it takes; while small differences in amount of snow won’t change this (the snow removal equipment just drives around the city in the same pattern), at some point increasing snow is going to slow the process down.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - KevinL - 01-22-2022

(01-22-2022, 01:30 AM)jeffster Wrote: Good think we don't get a lot of large dumps around her. Not like it used to be around here anyway.

If we did regularly get heavy snow, though, I imagine we would be better prepared. It's because Monday's dump was a one-off, that it threw everything out of whack.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Bytor - 01-23-2022

(01-22-2022, 07:16 PM)KevinL Wrote:
(01-22-2022, 01:30 AM)jeffster Wrote: Good think we don't get a lot of large dumps around her. Not like it used to be around here anyway.

If we did regularly get heavy snow, though, I imagine we would be better prepared. It's because Monday's dump was a one-off, that it threw everything out of whack.

It wasn't a "one off", though, that will never happen again. It is being called a "once in 20 years" event, but that is still something that municipalities should be planning for. Not by buying extra equipment that will be unused, but certainly with a different playbook of alternate procedures so things like dumping too much snow on the tracks don't happen.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ac3r - 01-23-2022

Once in a 20 year event seems like media hyperbole. We get heavy 15cm+ snowfalls every year and since this is Canada, they should be prepared for it.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 01-23-2022

(01-23-2022, 08:01 PM)ac3r Wrote: Once in a 20 year event seems like media hyperbole. We get heavy 15cm+ snowfalls every year and since this is Canada, they should be prepared for it.

If anybody is calling it that they have the attention span of a gnat.

20 years takes us back to 2002. In that time we have had numerous storms comparable to this one. I might believe that this storm was a once-in-four-years storm. Just a few years ago the University of Waterloo closed for 2 days in a row during exams, when that meant massive re-scheduling.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 01-23-2022

(01-23-2022, 09:01 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: Just a few years ago the University of Waterloo closed for 2 days in a row during exams, when that meant massive re-scheduling.

I don't believe there was as much of a snowfall that time, though.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 01-23-2022

The last time over 30 cm of snow fell in a single event was 2008.

https://www.therecord.com/news/waterloo-region/2022/01/17/more-than-30-cm-of-snow-falls-in-waterloo-region-a-one-in-20-year-storm.html

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - jeffster - 01-23-2022

(01-23-2022, 09:18 PM)tomh009 Wrote: The last time over 30 cm of snow fell in a single event was 2008.

https://www.therecord.com/news/waterloo-region/2022/01/17/more-than-30-cm-of-snow-falls-in-waterloo-region-a-one-in-20-year-storm.html

Yes, I remember that storm in March 2008. Apparently, aside from 2008, we hadn't had large winter storms like this since the 1970's (1978 I believe). What I do remember is that I went to school between the late 1970's and early 1990's -- during that time, we had 1 snow day, that was the blizzard in 1978. We had a day when I was in middle school when windchills were at -40ºC, but school wasn't cancelled, but we only had about 9 kids in class, out of 35 (it was a smallest class). In high school we had exam deferred by a day due to the cold weather, I still went to school to study though.