Waterloo Region Connected
ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version

+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - nms - 04-13-2021

(04-13-2021, 12:27 AM)jwilliamson Wrote:
(04-12-2021, 08:38 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: That being said, if we're talking traditional LRT, I suspect one of the top bang for buck options is to make the north end of the LRT a loop...continue south from Conestoga Mall, split when Regina St. starts and make King and Regina one lane one way for cars, one lane, one way for LRT, and continue south and link up with the existing tracks in Uptown.  In addition to linking Laurier up directly, and also linking up a HUGE popuplation node, there is actually an enormous amount of empty land for development and plenty of area for intensification.  And the distance isn't very far, it would be a relatively low cost for that return.

How would you run service on such a loop? If you split the service so half the trains go north through Waterloo Park and half go north along King, then you only have half the frequency on either branch. You could add some trains that just run along the loop, but then there are more transfers.

(I'm not saying this is a bad idea, I'm just curious.)

It would be an interesting puzzle to bring the LRT down King St from Conestoga Mall.  Would you bring back lettered routes just like when there was the 7 A/B/C/D/E/F? Or have one unit doing a loop up the spur to the mall, down King to the Uptown Square (maybe both directions), while interspersing the train that ran the full route north and south? You could maintain the trip frequency by splitting the trains at the Uptown Square and putting the loop unit in between (Train A goes up the spur, Loop Unit A goes up the spur, Train B goes up King St, Loop Unit B goes up King St, Train C goes up the spur etc). It's nice to dream, but I'm not sure that we'll ever see the track density that existed in Old Toronto.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 04-13-2021

(04-13-2021, 12:27 AM)jwilliamson Wrote:
(04-12-2021, 08:38 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: That being said, if we're talking traditional LRT, I suspect one of the top bang for buck options is to make the north end of the LRT a loop...continue south from Conestoga Mall, split when Regina St. starts and make King and Regina one lane one way for cars, one lane, one way for LRT, and continue south and link up with the existing tracks in Uptown.  In addition to linking Laurier up directly, and also linking up a HUGE popuplation node, there is actually an enormous amount of empty land for development and plenty of area for intensification.  And the distance isn't very far, it would be a relatively low cost for that return.

How would you run service on such a loop? If you split the service so half the trains go north through Waterloo Park and half go north along King, then you only have half the frequency on either branch. You could add some trains that just run along the loop, but then there are more transfers.

(I'm not saying this is a bad idea, I'm just curious.)

Yeah, that is a good question, I've thought about that a few times, and I'm not really sure, I think running half up King and half up the Spur would make the most sense, frequency would be halved but that's okay so long as our frequency is high already...and stations near the north end (Northfield, Conestoga) would still see good frequencies, because for most destinations, it wouldn't matter which direction they got on.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 04-13-2021

(04-13-2021, 12:39 AM)dunkalunk Wrote: While on the topic of things far in the future:

[Image: WLHDhTE.png]

I tend to agree that an extension of the LRT from Conestoga Mall down King, West on University and Erb to The Boardwalk makes good sense both from a ridership and development standpoint.

I envision that the outer 2 lanes of Univsersity Ave would be converted into a transit mall with shared stations for all buses and LRT (similar layout to Willis Way in Uptown)

Also, given rail ownership, I could see an O-Train type of service from The Boardwalk to a new terminal at Region of Waterloo airport to connect the airport to both the GO station at Breslau and Downtown Kitchener.

Lol....everyone always wants to connect up the airport. Maybe you guys have a vision for our airport that I don't see.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 04-13-2021

(04-13-2021, 07:26 AM)danbrotherston Wrote:
(04-13-2021, 12:39 AM)dunkalunk Wrote: Also, given rail ownership, I could see an O-Train type of service from The Boardwalk to a new terminal at Region of Waterloo airport to connect the airport to both the GO station at Breslau and Downtown Kitchener.

Lol....everyone always wants to connect up the airport. Maybe you guys have a vision for our airport that I don't see.

Until such time that there are flights leaving throughout the day, a bus service to the airport makes a lot more sense. Minimal startup cost, and bus schedules can easily be adjusted based on flight schedules.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - dunkalunk - 04-13-2021

(04-13-2021, 07:26 AM)danbrotherston Wrote:
(04-13-2021, 12:39 AM)dunkalunk Wrote: While on the topic of things far in the future:

[Image: WLHDhTE.png]

I tend to agree that an extension of the LRT from Conestoga Mall down King, West on University and Erb to The Boardwalk makes good sense both from a ridership and development standpoint.

I envision that the outer 2 lanes of Univsersity Ave would be converted into a transit mall with shared stations for all buses and LRT (similar layout to Willis Way in Uptown)

Also, given rail ownership, I could see an O-Train type of service from The Boardwalk to a new terminal at Region of Waterloo airport to connect the airport to both the GO station at Breslau and Downtown Kitchener.

Lol....everyone always wants to connect up the airport. Maybe you guys have a vision for our airport that I don't see.

While on the topic of things far in the future. (Think 2060, when we have flying electric taxis between here are Toronto ?). In all seriousness though, any half-hourly service between Kitchener and Guelph is probably more valuable than an airport connection in the short term.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ac3r - 04-13-2021

(04-13-2021, 07:26 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Lol....everyone always wants to connect up the airport. Maybe you guys have a vision for our airport that I don't see.

I think the logic is "build it and they will come" but the airport has to grow first. It'll be a very, very, very long time before there is any sort of rail connection to the airport. Pearson only got the Union Pearson Express in 2015. I think we'll all be old and/or dead by the time YKF sees an LRT connecting it.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Bytor - 04-13-2021

(04-13-2021, 10:55 AM)ac3r Wrote:
(04-13-2021, 07:26 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Lol....everyone always wants to connect up the airport. Maybe you guys have a vision for our airport that I don't see.

I think the logic is "build it and they will come" but the airport has to grow first. It'll be a very, very, very long time before there is any sort of rail connection to the airport. Pearson only got the Union Pearson Express in 2015. I think we'll all be old and/or dead by the time YKF sees an LRT connecting it.

I think that UPX took so long to appear has more to do with the North American love of the automobile and dislike of sane public transit systems, rather than Pearson's volume of use. Where as for YKF, the issue there really is its volume of use.

"Build and they will come" is true, but is a lot easier to use as a justification for something that can be built incrementally, like bike lanes. We can't really build rail service to YKF incrementally. :-(

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - nms - 04-15-2021

(04-14-2021, 06:53 PM)dunkalunk Wrote: Northfield to R+T is closer to 2km.

It's actually around 1500m if not a bit less then that.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - kalis0490 - 04-19-2021

I think we should  talk more about the  Conestoga  /king /unversity to westmount line. It has the most potential for rt . 
More than a highland/victoria line currently I believe. Theyre building university and king again so it may be better to add bus lanes or something for potential ion rt 3. This route has been earmarked  in multiple regional docs for rt in future.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 04-20-2021

(04-19-2021, 09:18 PM)kalis0490 Wrote: I think we should  talk more about the  Conestoga  /king /unversity to westmount line. It has the most potential for rt . 
More than a highland/victoria line currently I believe. Theyre building university and king again so it may be better to add bus lanes or something for potential ion rt 3. This route has been earmarked  in multiple regional docs for rt in future.

I think BRT might be the right answer here, and that way it could still happen in the current decade. Something like a U-shaped BRT line along University, Ira Needles and Victoria?

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - kalis0490 - 04-20-2021

The portion king to university to waterloo station should be lrt imo as theres very high ppl/jobs/hectare, ridership of grt and development chance.  Moreso than any section in Cambridge I think , I think that lrt make sense given the crush loads. The Kitchener part ( highland/victoria) currently has far less of the above and brt makes sense  IMO. The grt ridership map I posted shows this.


That section  I was talking about was considered for ion but due to the rail corridor, they didn't go with the alignment. 

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - bpoland - 04-26-2021

The region is proposing a new pedestrian crossover at Willis Way station. Seems like they should have figured this out when building Ion but hopefully they can get it added soon. You can register your support and get more details here: https://forms.regionofwaterloo.ca/Transportation/Transportation-Administration-and-Communication/Caroline-South-of-Willis-Way-Level-2-PXO/Caroline-South-of-Willis-Way-Level-2-PXO

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - bgb_ca - 04-26-2021

(04-26-2021, 10:45 AM)bpoland Wrote: The region is proposing a new pedestrian crossover at Willis Way station.  Seems like they should have figured this out when building Ion but hopefully they can get it added soon.  You can register your support and get more details here: https://forms.regionofwaterloo.ca/Transportation/Transportation-Administration-and-Communication/Caroline-South-of-Willis-Way-Level-2-PXO/Caroline-South-of-Willis-Way-Level-2-PXO

Good. It is needed there. Most people getting off ION cross there anyway.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 04-26-2021

(04-26-2021, 11:20 AM)bgb_ca Wrote:
(04-26-2021, 10:45 AM)bpoland Wrote: The region is proposing a new pedestrian crossover at Willis Way station.  Seems like they should have figured this out when building Ion but hopefully they can get it added soon.  You can register your support and get more details here: https://forms.regionofwaterloo.ca/Transportation/Transportation-Administration-and-Communication/Caroline-South-of-Willis-Way-Level-2-PXO/Caroline-South-of-Willis-Way-Level-2-PXO

Good. It is needed there. Most people getting off ION cross there anyway.

I just submitted a “Support” response. The form isn’t very good however — takes forever to come up, then doesn’t have space for general comments, then the “thank you” page says “Change the text for this message”. Not a very impressive effort.

My main comment would be that the crossing should be in line with the existing crossing over the LRT tracks, so people who just want to cross the street and LRT can do so more conveniently.

Secondary comment: what sort of investigation will take place to understand how such an obviously needed crossing was omitted from the LRT plans? One doesn’t need to be a traffic engineer to see upon a cursory inspection of the plans that it is needed.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 04-26-2021

(04-26-2021, 01:00 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:
(04-26-2021, 11:20 AM)bgb_ca Wrote: Good. It is needed there. Most people getting off ION cross there anyway.

I just submitted a “Support” response. The form isn’t very good however — takes forever to come up, then doesn’t have space for general comments, then the “thank you” page says “Change the text for this message”. Not a very impressive effort.

My main comment would be that the crossing should be in line with the existing crossing over the LRT tracks, so people who just want to cross the street and LRT can do so more conveniently.

Secondary comment: what sort of investigation will take place to understand how such an obviously needed crossing was omitted from the LRT plans? One doesn’t need to be a traffic engineer to see upon a cursory inspection of the plans that it is needed.

Indeed, or both places...seem like they're begrudingly correcting a mistake they have opposed for a while.