ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
|
RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - KingandWeber - 04-30-2020 At the risk of stirring the pot, I highly doubt (but could be wrong) that it was the Region's idea to install the fences. Very likely, the business owners required, as part of their negotiations for the purchase of that strip of property, that the Region build a fence. If that is the case, then the question really becomes if this compromise was worth it for the ends of building the connection, or if we should not have bothered since it does not provide a good pedestrian experience. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 04-30-2020 (04-30-2020, 02:43 PM)KingandWeber Wrote: At the risk of stirring the pot, I highly doubt (but could be wrong) that it was the Region's idea to install the fences. Very likely, the business owners required, as part of their negotiations for the purchase of that strip of property, that the Region build a fence. If that is the case, then the question really becomes if this compromise was worth it for the ends of building the connection, or if we should not have bothered since it does not provide a good pedestrian experience. You may be right (and I'm told that if it was a government's decision, it was CoK), I completely agree that raises the question of whether the compromise was worth it, or even if they could just have pushed for a different situation. But MOST of all, why it is that businesses on this street want to limit their customer's access to their businesses. It is a systemic problem in this area. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - jeffster - 04-30-2020 (04-30-2020, 10:59 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Oh FFS...stupid f***ing fence... Not understanding the long fence either. It's an inconvenience not only to those crossing, but also anyone that may drive to one store and wish to shop at another. So the question is: was there a fence there before? That would seem to be the only legitimate excuse. Just checked -- no fence. I would have said that perhaps RBC wanted the fence there as a level of security, but a fence wouldn't need to enclose the walk way. So my other guess is that this is a safety measure, as the region bought the land that was separating the property the bank is on and the property that Part Source is on. Safety to pedestrians from walking on the lot rather than sidewalk. Could also be some other legal reason I am sure. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - taylortbb - 05-01-2020 (04-30-2020, 01:03 PM)Rainrider22 Wrote: You are wrong. There are Rules and Regulations set out to follow for a reason. Most rules were not created out of something good. They were created out of necessity because something bad happened. Mitigating risk to others is never a bad thing even if it means you have to walk to the end of a pathway to get to where you want to go. I find it hard to believe it mitigates any real risk to people though. As Dan has pointed out, people walk from their cars that are parked right beside the fence, so clearly it's a place that people are expected to be walking. I can accept it mitigates legal risk to the business, but maybe the question is then, why are businesses allowed to do that? Through zoning in downtown areas we often require that privately owned property be paved like it was an extension of the sidewalk. The 1 Victoria condos are an example of this, where the sidewalk in front of them appears much wider than the actual sidewalk due to part of private property being paved level with the sidewalk. The city wouldn't allow 1 Victoria to install a fence along there, even though it would mitigate 1 Victoria's risk of someone slipping and falling on their property. Why we do allow it on Fairway Rd? Accepting that risk should be a requirement of running a business that is open to the public, adjacent to a trail. If people walking represents such risk to businesses, but people driving doesn't, maybe the problem is our liability laws. Make the business liable for car collisions on their property, but not for pedestrians walking through it, and suddenly businesses will be eager to ensure people walk to their business rather than drive. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Rainrider22 - 05-01-2020 (05-01-2020, 11:29 AM)taylortbb Wrote:To be clear...I am not saying I am in agreement or not. I am simply saying, with my own personal experiences with business insurance, I can totally see the demand was placed on the property owners by the insurance company. It isn't like business and property owners want to spend money..,(04-30-2020, 01:03 PM)Rainrider22 Wrote: You are wrong. There are Rules and Regulations set out to follow for a reason. Most rules were not created out of something good. They were created out of necessity because something bad happened. Mitigating risk to others is never a bad thing even if it means you have to walk to the end of a pathway to get to where you want to go. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 05-01-2020 This is one of those cases where I really wish we had more information. I’m pretty much convinced that the fences should not be there. I haven’t actually been there and investigated carefully enough to be 100% certain, but based on what I’ve seen in this thread I feel pretty comfortable saying they are a mistake and should not have been built. That being said, whose mistake? Fearful insurance companies? Fearful business owners? Courts which make stupid liability decisions? City planners following a rule book that clearly doesn’t apply? I don’t know and can’t tell without more detail about how the design decisions were made. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 05-01-2020 (05-01-2020, 01:42 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: This is one of those cases where I really wish we had more information. I agree it could be any of them, but I don't care who or why, there's more than enough blame to go around. At the end of the day the city built it, they should have pushed back on the requirements to have fencing if those requirements didn't come from them. I am utterly sick and tired of the excuses. This was an oversight 5 years ago, I can buy, that a mistake was made, our planning--even for public transit--completely ignores the people on foot, and considers ONLY cars. But that was 5 years ago, it should not have taken this long, we all play a part. How come those businesses weren't demanding this be solved, it's their customers that have been cut off. The fact is, such a situation would never have been allowed to occur for car drivers, by giving credit for the original oversight, I'm being generous, but taking 5 years to fix it is unacceptable to me. The final fix being broken in this way, also unacceptable. At some point, someone has to stand up and say no, this BS cannot continue. We all thing we're progressive because we built an LRT that literally prevents people from from walking places, that has stations that are inaccessible to people on foot, the problem is not money...the problem is mindset. That's why this makes me angry, because it just shows the mindset has not changed. The problem is bigger than "one" obstacle, the problem is everyone being complicit in the broken system. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - creative - 05-01-2020 Out of curiosity. How does complaining on a forum lead to a fix of the problem. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 05-01-2020 (05-01-2020, 04:39 PM)creative Wrote: Out of curiosity. How does complaining on a forum lead to a fix of the problem. If you don't want to participate in the discussion, you don't have to participate in the discussion. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - creative - 05-01-2020 Just asking! RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - plam - 05-01-2020 (05-01-2020, 04:39 PM)creative Wrote: Out of curiosity. How does complaining on a forum lead to a fix of the problem. People talk about it, decide that they're not the only ones who think it's a concern, organize in person, contact their representatives, and delegate at public meetings. How else does change get made? Not through individual action for the most part. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - WLU - 05-01-2020 (04-30-2020, 03:40 PM)jeffster Wrote:Actually the existing parking lots are two separate pieces of property. The owners of Parts Source a (stand-alone building) may not appreciate someone parking on their lot and then heading over to the bank or vice versa.(04-30-2020, 10:59 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Oh FFS...stupid f***ing fence... RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - WLU - 05-01-2020 (04-30-2020, 01:23 PM)jamincan Wrote: There are other examples of walkways adjacent to commercial properties that aren't fenced off, but there are also lots, probably the majority, of examples where they are fenced off. I agree with Dan that this is actually a fairly significant safety issue as it can prevent escape for a potential victim. In comparison, it's hard for me to believe that the risk to adjacent businesses is more than marginally higher. It's the sort of thing that would have been brought up immediately with public consultation.Just curious, just asking a question but what scenario would you see where it prevents escape for a potential victim. Again just asking, no offence. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 05-01-2020 (05-01-2020, 10:50 PM)WLU Wrote:(04-30-2020, 03:40 PM)jeffster Wrote: Not understanding the long fence either. It's an inconvenience not only to those crossing, but also anyone that may drive to one store and wish to shop at another.Actually the existing parking lots are two separate pieces of property. The owners of Parts Source a (stand-alone building) may not appreciate someone parking on their lot and then heading over to the bank or vice versa. Why not? They could before...why wouldn't partsource want it's customers to have convenient access to a bank? RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 05-01-2020 (05-01-2020, 10:50 PM)WLU Wrote:(04-30-2020, 01:23 PM)jamincan Wrote: There are other examples of walkways adjacent to commercial properties that aren't fenced off, but there are also lots, probably the majority, of examples where they are fenced off. I agree with Dan that this is actually a fairly significant safety issue as it can prevent escape for a potential victim. In comparison, it's hard for me to believe that the risk to adjacent businesses is more than marginally higher. It's the sort of thing that would have been brought up immediately with public consultation.Just curious, just asking a question but what scenario would you see where it prevents escape for a potential victim. Again just asking, no offence. You do understand how cages work yes? When there is no fence I have 365 directions I can run away from someone who is threatening, when the fences are up, I have one, and there could be a train in the way, or another person. |