Waterloo Region Connected
ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version

+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 07-08-2019

Page 1000!

I had been wondering whether it would arrive before Ion opened. Only missed it by a couple of weeks.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - trainspotter139 - 07-09-2019

(07-08-2019, 12:10 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:
(07-08-2019, 10:14 AM)trainspotter139 Wrote: ATP is not required for full speed for the time being.

Then why don’t they run at full speed? I don’t believe they are exceeding 50km/h on the ATP sections even though speeds up to 70km/h are posted in many areas.

The vehicles themselves aren't currently allowing them to travel at full speeds due to an unrelated issue. They don't need to run at full speeds though to comply with the travel time requirements.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - taylortbb - 07-09-2019

(07-09-2019, 12:49 AM)trainspotter139 Wrote:
(07-08-2019, 12:10 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: Then why don’t they run at full speed? I don’t believe they are exceeding 50km/h on the ATP sections even though speeds up to 70km/h are posted in many areas.

The vehicles themselves aren't currently allowing them to travel at full speeds due to an unrelated issue. They don't need to run at full speeds though to comply with the travel time requirements.

Can you share details of the unrelated issue? Very curious.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - timc - 07-09-2019

(07-08-2019, 07:10 PM)Bob_McBob Wrote:

Yep. That is pretty standard stop-sign behaviour around here too. When you use stop signs for traffic calming, people will start to ignore them and treat them as yields.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - MidTowner - 07-09-2019

It's true that stop signs make for poor traffic calming. Hereabouts, they are not generally advised by planners expressly for traffic calming (since motorists ignore them, and tend to accelerate hard after passing them), but it's true that they have been in the past.

There is very little enforcement. Maybe it's just not cost effective to enforce this kind of traffic violation when the only way to do it is to use police officers who generally make six figure salaries.

What's the solution then? I'd agree that we should get rid of a lot of stop signs and instead reduce vehicle speeds (by using infrastructure that makes speeding a real challenge). There would still be call for stop signs in some places- would it really be the case that, with relatively fewer of them, people would start taking them seriously?

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - jamincan - 07-09-2019

Lower neighbourhood speed limits to a hard 30kph, but replace stop signs with yields? That's something I might get behind.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 07-09-2019

https://www.therecord.com/news-story/9492700-ion-trains-in-two-separate-crashes-on-monday

The ION rep claims this is the 7th and 8th collisions involving the LRT. Apparently I've lost count, I had this at 6th and 7th. Have they all made the press?

In related news, I see fare inspectors out every time I go out, it's starting to grind on me that they have continual enforcement against riders of the system (where fare cards are barely functional...Queen Station had no payment options whatsoever this morning[1]) and yet, drivers continue to drive dangerously around the train and literally crash into it, with zero enforcement whatsoever (the driver involved in the first collision, who was at fault, has apparently not been charged....in fact, a number of the drivers have not been)...


[1]


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - MidTowner - 07-09-2019

I have yet to have proof of payment demanded of me, though I have seen the inspectors aboard; I take Ion twice daily, sometimes a third time. But my first ride is at 6:30.

This morning at GRH, the card reader presented an error message the first two times I tapped. Only on the third try did it take. But it did work for me, eventually. I wonder how many riders might have (quite reasonably) just given up.

Departure times are still not being displayed, it seems.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 07-09-2019

(07-09-2019, 08:13 AM)MidTowner Wrote: What's the solution then? I'd agree that we should get rid of a lot of stop signs and instead reduce vehicle speeds (by using infrastructure that makes speeding a real challenge). There would still be call for stop signs in some places- would it really be the case that, with relatively fewer of them, people would start taking them seriously?

Effectively most people are treating the stop signs as yield signs already.

In Europe, where yield signs are far more common, the less-frequent stop signs do get more respect.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - plam - 07-09-2019

(07-09-2019, 09:34 AM)MidTowner Wrote: I have yet to have proof of payment demanded of me, though I have seen the inspectors aboard; I take Ion twice daily, sometimes a third time. But my first ride is at 6:30.

This morning at GRH, the card reader presented an error message the first two times I tapped. Only on the third try did it take. But it did work for me, eventually. I wonder how many riders might have (quite reasonably) just given up.

Departure times are still not being displayed, it seems.

The Ticket Vending Machines continue to eat bills. This easyGo system seems like a complete fiasco. My spouse put in a $20 bill yesterday after we had forgotten to set up autoload on her card and the machine just ate it. We've called in to GRT and I think that they are going to mail us cheques maybe?

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - jeffster - 07-09-2019

(07-08-2019, 08:36 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:
(07-08-2019, 07:10 PM)Bob_McBob Wrote:

Wow. I do have to point out that to my knowledge the poster of the video is incorrect in that Ontario is not a “timed stop” jurisdiction — all you have to do is stop, then proceed when it is safe and everybody who has right of way is out of the way. Also when there is truly nobody around (not other traffic, not pedestrians, nobody) I really don’t see any reason why a full stop is any better than almost stopping. But some parts of the video almost look like those photos of traffic in India where everybody just edges forward until the other traffic yields.

The LRT problems, however, clearly stem from a pervasive ignoring of signals of all types.

But therein lies the problem. It's the attitude that it doesn't matter if anyone isn't around. So we start yielding at stop signs rather than stop, at a "STOP" sign. It then leads to drivers running reds when 'no one is around', and pulling other illegal maneuvers, such as what we're seeing with the LRT. Left on no-left turn red lights (example is Ottawa St S eastbound at Westmount northbound), going right on no-right turn red lights, u-turning at no u-turns. Ignoring stop signs and red lights altogether. What happens then is that people are so used to no stopping at stop signs that it becomes second nature for them disobey traffic signs. Then it goes to the no-turn red lights, no u-turns, red lights, etc. Poor driving habits is another way to put it. STOP signs are never, ever, YIELD signs, so we shouldn't ever treat like a YIELD sign.

I do recall an incident where a motorist didn't stop at a stop sign because 'no was around' and was t-boned by someone that had the right away -- but apparently came out of 'no where'. Magically, of course. The real issue was the driver in the wrong getting used to the idea of not stopping, just yields, or even timing stop signs (so you see traffic at a two-way stop, but calculate you have enough time to carry-on as if you had no stop sign safely).

I agree, though, that stop signs are not timed events. You come to a complete stop then proceed to do so if safe.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - KevinT - 07-09-2019

I had my first experience with fare inspection this morning.

I'd tapped in at Block Line heading north, and the inspectors apparently boarded at Central wearing the yellow Transit Security vests that I've seen before. I didn't notice them boarding but there was an announcement "Fare inspectors onboard, show proof of payment." The two inspectors had boarded at opposite ends and worked their way to the middle, using terminals that looked similar to restaurant debit machines but which probably also had barcode scanners in their ends (I didn't get to see a paper transfers being scanned to confirm).

Despite the train having full seats and about 20 standing passengers, they were done and had met in the middle by Grand River Hospital thanks to everyone having their cards/transfers ready for inspection due to the announcement. As far as I could tell they didn't have to ticket or warn anybody, and they got off at Laurier / Waterloo Park station.

I was impressed by how courteous, fast, and efficient the whole process was. Well done guys!

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - jeffster - 07-09-2019

(07-09-2019, 08:56 AM)jamincan Wrote: Lower neighbourhood speed limits to a hard 30kph, but replace stop signs with yields? That's something I might get behind.

You could, but understand that most drivers don't know what 'yield' means. Not to mention that most people don't signal anymore either, so even if yielding was allowed, I think you'd see more accidents because you're not yielding to the correct drivers (not really your fault).

Also not sure if any solution would help in reducing LRT mishaps.

Also confused as to what the job of the police are now-a-days. We have over 800 sworn officers with a $150M budget. I can't see them all involved in major crimes all the time.

I think what needs to be done is less speed traps on those lower speed, low pedestrian streets where speed traps are easy money. More training for the police themselves to learn how to drive, as they're up there is taxi drivers at being horrible drivers, and the public does notice. They also need to break less. Where I work, for example, we're a public (government) building with a large parking lot, and it's very common for several times a day police randomly choosing a place to stop and chat with their co-workers. These should be 10 minute or 20 minute breaks (and I believe the police get paid for 8 hours work in an 8 hour shift with 2 10 minute breaks and 1 20 minute break, all paid). Not 3 45 to 75-minute breaks that they're taking. Then the police need to start blitzing for these traffic violations. For example, along the LRT line between King and Union, have 3 or 4 officers at these hotspots to ticket anyone violating any traffic law. Go to busy 3-way or 4-way stops, and ticket violators there.

Just some suggestions....

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - bgb_ca - 07-09-2019

(07-09-2019, 11:14 AM)KevinT Wrote: I had my first experience with fare inspection this morning.

I'd tapped in at Block Line heading north, and the inspectors apparently boarded at Central wearing the yellow Transit Security vests that I've seen before.  I didn't notice them boarding but there was an announcement "Fare inspectors onboard, show proof of payment."  The two inspectors had boarded at opposite ends and worked their way to the middle, using terminals that looked similar to restaurant debit machines but which probably also had barcode scanners in their ends (I didn't get to see a paper transfers being scanned to confirm).

Despite the train having full seats and about 20 standing passengers, they were done and had met in the middle by Grand River Hospital thanks to everyone having their cards/transfers ready for inspection due to the announcement.  As far as I could tell they didn't have to ticket or warn anybody, and they got off at Laurier / Waterloo Park station.

I was impressed by how courteous, fast, and efficient the whole process was.  Well done guys!

They can scan bar codes (I've seen it). They also caught me on a missed tap (machine appearantly didn't read my card) but just told me since I have a monthly pass (they can see that) to just be sure the machine shows the tap was successful before I walk away from it. (The bad tap was at R&T north side which sometimes displays card info instead of a registered tap).

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - KevinT - 07-09-2019

(07-09-2019, 12:56 PM)bgb_ca Wrote: They can scan bar codes (I've seen it). They also caught me on a missed tap (machine appearantly didn't read my card) but just told me since I have a monthly pass (they can see that) to just be sure the machine shows the tap was successful before I walk away from it. (The bad tap was at R&T north side which sometimes displays card info instead of a registered tap).

I've had similar bad taps at the north side of R&T Park, but fortunately was looking at the screen and caught it and so tapped again. My theory at the time was that somebody before me had pushed the podium button for a card check and that there's no timeout on that operation so the modifier was still hanging around when I tapped my card. If you've had the same thing happen in the same place however, maybe it is a flat out bug. Sad