GO Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: GO Transit (/showthread.php?tid=12) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
|
RE: GO Transit - danbrotherston - 06-16-2017 (06-15-2017, 10:36 PM)jamincan Wrote: Aren't diesel locomotives actually driven by electric motors too? I always thought the main benefit came when you had EMUs. Yes, this is the case, diesel locomotives are already electric, so what is driving the wheels is the same. You can also do DMUs for a similar benefit to EMUs. A perusal of wikipedia would seem to suggest one of the benefits of the overhead catenary system is actually an increase in power over what is feasible with diesel. Also, there is substantially less weight not having to haul around a diesel engine and a generator, but that's obviously lost on dual mode trains. RE: GO Transit - jamincan - 06-16-2017 So basically the reason diesel locomotives have slower acceleration is some combination of increased weight and limited on-board power supply? RE: GO Transit - SammyOES2 - 06-16-2017 (06-15-2017, 03:29 PM)tomh009 Wrote: Diesel engine might have something like 35% efficiency. I'm finding this whole discussion really interesting. Are there reputable detailed studies comparing these? It seems really complex to actually figure out the relative efficiencies. RE: GO Transit - Canard - 06-16-2017 (06-16-2017, 08:04 AM)jamincan Wrote: So basically the reason diesel locomotives have slower acceleration is some combination of increased weight and limited on-board power supply? Exactly! RE: GO Transit - tomh009 - 06-16-2017 (06-16-2017, 08:01 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: A perusal of wikipedia would seem to suggest one of the benefits of the overhead catenary system is actually an increase in power over what is feasible with diesel. Also, there is substantially less weight not having to haul around a diesel engine and a generator, but that's obviously lost on dual mode trains. And not having to haul around a full tank of diesel fuel. RE: GO Transit - danbrotherston - 06-16-2017 (06-16-2017, 09:26 AM)tomh009 Wrote:(06-16-2017, 08:01 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: A perusal of wikipedia would seem to suggest one of the benefits of the overhead catenary system is actually an increase in power over what is feasible with diesel. Also, there is substantially less weight not having to haul around a diesel engine and a generator, but that's obviously lost on dual mode trains. That probably helps too, but I imagine not as much as not having to haul around a diesel engine. I believe this is one reason our previous high speed train attempts were powered by gas turbine engines. RE: GO Transit - DHLawrence - 06-16-2017 I wonder if the 1965 blackout played a part as well - fears of your high-speed train being stranded in the middle of nowhere when the power goes out. RE: GO Transit - kps - 06-16-2017 (06-15-2017, 10:36 PM)jamincan Wrote: Aren't diesel locomotives actually driven by electric motors too? “just as completely electric as though their power came from a third rail or an overhead wire” If that sounds like a bit of sophistry, well, at least they had actual running trains. RE: GO Transit - DHLawrence - 06-16-2017 And back then it probably wasn't impossible to find early pure diesel engines still in use in yards somewhere. RE: GO Transit - danbrotherston - 06-16-2017 (06-16-2017, 10:07 PM)DHLawrence Wrote: And back then it probably wasn't impossible to find early pure diesel engines still in use in yards somewhere. I don't think it's impossible now. I'm pretty sure the UPX trains are driven by a mechanical drivetrain instead of a diesel electric one. RE: GO Transit - trainspotter139 - 06-17-2017 One of the main downsides to a Diesel-Electric Locomotive is the Diesel Prime Mover doesn't accelerate or rev up as quickly as it would in a car or a truck, and so the power output from the generator is not as nice while it revs up as it would be in a purely electric locomotive. Note: the 66 GO MPI MP40-3C locomotives have an EMD 710GB 16 cylinder diesel prime mover and a Caterpillar C-27 diesel engine for the Head-End Power generator. the 1(+16 on order) GO MPI MP54AC have 2 16-cylinder Cummins QSK60 EPA Tier 4 engines as prime movers and HEP generators. RE: GO Transit - Canard - 07-11-2017 I see the tweets about once a week about pedestrians getting hit and killed by GO trains, but sadly yesterday a pedestrian was hit and killed right in Kitchener, at Lancaster. We live not far from there and I cringe every time I hear a horn blow, because the trains inside the city limits use their bells. Horn means "someone is trespassing on the tracks". Sadly this resulted in death. RE: GO Transit - ijmorlan - 07-11-2017 (07-11-2017, 10:52 AM)Canard Wrote: I see the tweets about once a week about pedestrians getting hit and killed by GO trains, but sadly yesterday a pedestrian was hit and killed right in Kitchener, at Lancaster. I hadn’t heard about that. I believe that crossing has gates as well — any word on how it happened? I mean, was the person just trying to get across before the train, or is there some explanation of the circumstances? Or did it happen near the crossing, but it’s really about somebody going for a stroll on the main line? RE: GO Transit - Markster - 07-11-2017 The less information about the incident, the more likely that it's a suicide. RE: GO Transit - panamaniac - 07-11-2017 (07-11-2017, 01:25 PM)Markster Wrote: The less information about the incident, the more likely that it's a suicide. Yes, the police have confirmed that the death is "not suspicious", which is the usual code from officialdom. |