GO Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: GO Transit (/showthread.php?tid=12) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
|
RE: GO Transit - nms - 05-12-2017 To be fair, the lines in question that connect to and through Cambridge currently carry freight traffic and are maintained accordingly. Getting GO to Kitchener was likely helped by the fact that VIA traveled the corridor enough to have passenger grade maintenance. As well, there was only one railway option while in Cambridge (as Mayor Craig suggests) there are two. Rather than having to focus on one railway, their efforts would have to be split between two. RE: GO Transit - SammyOES2 - 05-12-2017 Yeah, was there really any way that Cambridge could have gotten what they wanted? KW is also the favorite son right now because of the tech industry. I think they just generally have more pull then Cambridge does. RE: GO Transit - Coke6pk - 05-12-2017 Craig says all you need to do is have one train each way continue on to Cambridge instead of stopping in Milton. It's just that easy... nothing else required.... Coke RE: GO Transit - DHLawrence - 05-12-2017 I'm not sure where he's getting "15 years" from. More like 25+. RE: GO Transit - Drake - 05-13-2017 Is it my imagination or is Doug Craig the only one stumping for this issue? I understand he likely has burned some bridges, but where is our regional politicians? This GO train connection is long overdue. Its pretty disappointing that there is no will for this to happen. RE: GO Transit - KevinL - 05-13-2017 I think the Regional reps are being more realistic about the timeline - they know Metrolinx's priorities and the issues with CP will make this more of a slow burn. RE: GO Transit - DHLawrence - 05-13-2017 And they'd rather have two-way service to Kitchener. Not that it isn't easier, since Metrolinx owns most of the route, but it's hard not to take it personally. RE: GO Transit - mpd618 - 05-13-2017 The narrative of Cambridge GO service is easier commutes to Toronto; the narrative of (two-way) Kitchener GO service is more economic activity within Waterloo Region. It's not exactly hard to see why there's more momentum around the latter. RE: GO Transit - DHLawrence - 05-13-2017 No reason we can't have economic activity too. Kitchener and Waterloo are going to run out of easy to develop/redevelop land eventually. Send a little of that our way. RE: GO Transit - mpd618 - 05-13-2017 Right, and I think that would be a better narrative to support GO expansion to Cambridge than the one Mayor Craig has mostly been promoting. The idea of connecting Galt to the Kitchener Line via Guelph is interesting, though. RE: GO Transit - KevinL - 05-13-2017 (05-13-2017, 05:08 PM)mpd618 Wrote: The idea of connecting Galt to the Kitchener Line via Guelph is interesting, though. I'm a big fan of this, especially the possibility of a proper Hespeler station. RE: GO Transit - DHLawrence - 05-13-2017 Would GO be willing to operate one railway line to two different destinations so far apart? (Hamilton notwithstanding) RE: GO Transit - yige_t - 05-15-2017 This one's for the railfans - one of the original GO Train cab cars from the 1960's is now on display at the Toronto Railway Museum roundhouse, opposite CN Tower: https://www.facebook.com/GOtransitOfficial/posts/10155199654158444 RE: GO Transit - Viewfromthe42 - 05-15-2017 (05-13-2017, 04:17 PM)DHLawrence Wrote: No reason we can't have economic activity too. Kitchener and Waterloo are going to run out of easy to develop/redevelop land eventually. Send a little of that our way. There's not much impetus to extend rail lines to reach new parking lots. All Cambridge has largely been interested in is getting parking lots for their residents to use GO, but what economic activity does this add? It might drive up home prices by making Cambridge akin to some of the farthest Lakeshore East stations, a place to buy a cheaper-than-GTA home and then drive to a GO parking lot. Kitchener has gotten theirs in no small part because of a committment they've started towards making a 2-way system viable, which includes focusing on creating workplaces near transit, and effective transit to get you to workplaces (ION). Waterloo region even has stats showing that more people commute into the region than out of it for work, which only adds to the priority of the Kitchener line over any extension of Milton's. Perhaps when Doug Craig isn't only finding problems with LRT enough to throw wrenches in the process, or working hard to make sure any kind of usable density comes to any part of Cambridge, then we might see changing fortunes. RE: GO Transit - MidTowner - 05-15-2017 I think that’s pretty well-said. The case for a commuter line into downtown Toronto from a park-and-ride probably makes a whole lot more sense from Oshawa (60 kilometres from downtown) than from Cambridge (100+km), especially nowadays. Investments in the Kitchener Line will serve to further progress towards development goals, and create better connections within the Waterloo-Toronto economic cluster. That’s the better case. It’s not just an issue of ridership on day one. |