+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Land Development and Real Estate (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Urban Areas (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours (/showthread.php?tid=8)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Owen - 10-11-2016
(10-11-2016, 10:23 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: @Markster Exactly what I said, "private interests trumping public good".
What exactly do you propose as an alternative... that the govt expropriate the property from the owner and hand it over to the developer? Don't get me wrong - I agree it's a shame - the owner is being greedy, and his Karma is that he'll end up with nothing as nothing can be developed (that justifies a much higher price per acre) on a 19' strip of land - but I have a hard time seeing where the 'private interests trump public good' argument leads... ?
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - nms - 10-11-2016
Who knows what the current owners reasons were, we weren't at the negotiating table. There may have been multiple shareholders in the property (especially if the land transferred to the children of the original owner). They may have looked at what other downtown property was selling for and figured that they deserved a better deal. Anyone wants to compare this price per acre to the market rate according to more recent transactions? Look at this way, it will give Manulife the option to plant some really big columns if they every decide to build up.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - danbrotherston - 10-11-2016
(10-11-2016, 12:18 PM)Owen Wrote:(10-11-2016, 10:23 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: @Markster Exactly what I said, "private interests trumping public good".
What exactly do you propose as an alternative... that the govt expropriate the property from the owner and hand it over to the developer? Don't get me wrong - I agree it's a shame - the owner is being greedy, and his Karma is that he'll end up with nothing as nothing can be developed (that justifies a much higher price per acre) on a 19' strip of land - but I have a hard time seeing where the 'private interests trump public good' argument leads... ?
I am not implying any particular alternative or solution here. This is far more of a deep conversation than belongs here. But as you agree, that doesn't make my statement any less true. I would generally like to see this happen less often.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Owen - 10-11-2016
(10-11-2016, 01:56 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:(10-11-2016, 12:18 PM)Owen Wrote: What exactly do you propose as an alternative... that the govt expropriate the property from the owner and hand it over to the developer? Don't get me wrong - I agree it's a shame - the owner is being greedy, and his Karma is that he'll end up with nothing as nothing can be developed (that justifies a much higher price per acre) on a 19' strip of land - but I have a hard time seeing where the 'private interests trump public good' argument leads... ?
I am not implying any particular alternative or solution here. This is far more of a deep conversation than belongs here. But as you agree, that doesn't make my statement any less true. I would generally like to see this happen less often.
The "invisible hand" doesn't always act swiftly, but it's much better than the alternative
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - panamaniac - 10-12-2016
A good opportunity for the City to expropriate the strip at it's now much-reduced value to create a sculpture garden or other amenity.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - rangersfan - 10-12-2016
It seems silly on the landowners part, I wonder what they are holding out for specifically? Regardless it is nice to hear a very prominent gap Downtown could be filled in, in the relatively near future.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 10-12-2016
(10-12-2016, 09:13 AM)panamaniac Wrote: A good opportunity for the City to expropriate the strip at it's now much-reduced value to create a sculpture garden or other amenity.
At 19' wide it's a bit small even for a garden.
Mind you, in Tokyo it's not uncommon to see 4-6 storey buildings that are only 3-4m wide. I don't think those would be popular here, though. 19' of lot width means about 18' of interior width. Workable for small retail, but quite restrictive for the layout of the residential floors. You could make it work with just two units per floor (and a staircase in the middle, entered from the back of the building) but only one room would end up having a window in each unit.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - KevinL - 10-12-2016
At that size you're best off with studio apartments anyway, so one window would be expected.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - white_brian - 10-12-2016
Today at Spadina and Highland
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Pheidippides - 10-13-2016
Some very deep pits excavated very quickly at the Highland/Spadina property:
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Pheidippides - 10-16-2016
The old Madison Steel Company building has been cleaned up and is ready for rent (Google street view is a higher quality image than my flip phone's camera).
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - white_brian - 10-16-2016
I know Kieswetter Demolition was using this as an in town yard and I had understood that they were using the whole site/building. Would be nice though if there were rentals there though!
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - rangersfan - 10-16-2016
I used to walk down Madison on a regular basis and the changes to the building are quite significant. I am a big fan of exposed brick especially on old industrial buildings, which I would have preferred here. But the end result looks like it is clean and fresh.
The best changes IMO:
- Removal of the old rickety fence along the parking lot
- The green framing around the windows
- The wood pillars used for the side entrance roof structure
it's great to see an old industrial building be preserved and refreshed.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Pheidippides - 10-16-2016
Interesting that all the for sale/lease information lists it as within 800m of an LRT stop, but the three closest stations are all about 1.3km.
http://x.lnimg.com/attachments/CB3C4E7B-FB46-424D-B8F5-03512B146A44.pdf
https://s3.amazonaws.com/spacelist-paperclip/datas/000/196/753/original/235_Madison_Ave_S-pdf.pdf?1420388994
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - panamaniac - 10-16-2016
(10-16-2016, 04:57 PM)rangersfan Wrote: I used to walk down Madison on a regular basis and the changes to the building are quite significant. I am a big fan of exposed brick especially on old industrial buildings, which I would have preferred here. But the end result looks like it is clean and fresh.
The best changes IMO:
- Removal of the old rickety fence along the parking lot
- The green framing around the windows
- The wood pillars used for the side entrance roof structure
it's great to see an old industrial building be preserved and refreshed.
It does look much better. I wish something could be done with the old Robson Lang site across the tracks. I suspect that is one of the most toxic bits of land in K-W.