Grand River Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: Grand River Transit (/showthread.php?tid=13) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
|
RE: Grand River Transit - ijmorlan - 07-09-2022 (07-09-2022, 06:34 PM)taylortbb Wrote: I believe the signs at the LRT stations are off-the-shelf INIT models, just like GRT uses for their bus stops. The last time I looked at the INIT specs (admittedly several years ago) the sign model used for the LRT stations didn't have a wired version, it was made with an integrated cell modem. I actually believe the cell service was provided through INIT as a part of a service contract. Thanks for this information. I agree sticking with something commercially available is, unfortunately, usually the best way to go. No organization can be a research and development organization for every one of their inputs. I’m disappointed if wired Ethernet isn’t an option. I wonder if they could even be POE (Power Over Ethernet), based on the power requirements? One can imagine making a choice at purchase time whether or not to have the cell modem incorporated into the case or instead to just make the ethernet port available. It seems like poor modularization if this isn’t an option. And providing the cell service as part of the display contract is clearly poor design. Display manufacturers should stick to manufacturing displays. Yes, I know everybody wants to provide integrated solutions, but it’s just not good design for customers to be unable to build their own system out of well-defined modules that each do one simple thing. RE: Grand River Transit - ac3r - 07-10-2022 You guys are forgetting one key thing: they built this thing with pennies. No way they would have included all these features as it would have inflated the budget necessities even higher. RE: Grand River Transit - Bob_McBob - 07-12-2022 GRT is holding an opening ceremony and tour of the new Northfield bus storage facility at 1pm on July 14. Electric and articulated buses will be on display. https://www.facebook.com/GRTROW/posts/pfbid02fmcaqadFgg5GWspdhnT9aBxJitskYoEwmtkgKWJPiLtesqu8ZBVqaDvSu89oNLWNl RE: Grand River Transit - bravado - 09-12-2022 Not certain if this qualifies as newsworthy, but hoping some local experts have things to say about it: "WATERLOO REGION — The region has hired Mathieu Goetzke, a current VP with Metrolinx, as its new commissioner for transportation services. Goetzke will lead a team that will prioritize the resident experience, while building neighbourhoods that are safe, accessible and healthy, a news release from Waterloo Region said on Thursday." https://www.cambridgetimes.ca/news-story/10707582-waterloo-region-hires-metrolinx-vp-as-new-commissioner-for-transportation-services/ RE: Grand River Transit - danbrotherston - 09-12-2022 (09-12-2022, 05:10 PM)bravado Wrote: Not certain if this qualifies as newsworthy, but hoping some local experts have things to say about it: Definitely newsworthy. Quite frankly, given Metrolinx's mediocre performance, I don't think that's a particularly inspiring qualification. But working in as the Chief Planner for Lille in France is a *lil* more inspiring. Still, only time will tell how this hire will impact the region...but I don't think you can get more regressive than our current transportation engineering team. RE: Grand River Transit - tomh009 - 09-12-2022 (09-12-2022, 06:44 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: Quite frankly, given Metrolinx's mediocre performance, I don't think that's a particularly inspiring qualification. Former VP of Planning at Metrolinx. But would he have been the one responsible for the Metrolinx performance in that role? I suspect not. RE: Grand River Transit - ijmorlan - 09-12-2022 (09-12-2022, 07:40 PM)tomh009 Wrote:(09-12-2022, 06:44 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: Quite frankly, given Metrolinx's mediocre performance, I don't think that's a particularly inspiring qualification. I could go either way on this. It could be bad, because he will bring the Metrolinx culture here, or it could be great, because he is better than that and realized he couldn’t have a good impact at Metrolinx. RE: Grand River Transit - jamincan - 09-14-2022 Our existing transportation commissioner sets the bar very very low, so I'd take this announcement with a healthy dose of optimism RE: Grand River Transit - Bytor - 09-16-2022 (09-14-2022, 01:56 PM)jamincan Wrote: Our existing transportation commissioner sets the bar very very low, so I'd take this announcement with a healthy dose of optimism If you mean Thomas Schmidt, he retired several months ago. RE: Grand River Transit - danbrotherston - 09-16-2022 (09-16-2022, 11:11 AM)Bytor Wrote:(09-14-2022, 01:56 PM)jamincan Wrote: Our existing transportation commissioner sets the bar very very low, so I'd take this announcement with a healthy dose of optimism Lol...I did not know that...good riddance...he told me I was wrong in a public council meeting...even though I was directly quoting engineering standards. But he's hardly the only problematic senior transportation engineer at the region. RE: Grand River Transit - jamincan - 09-20-2022 (09-16-2022, 11:11 AM)Bytor Wrote:(09-14-2022, 01:56 PM)jamincan Wrote: Our existing transportation commissioner sets the bar very very low, so I'd take this announcement with a healthy dose of optimism That was who I meant. It's kind of funny that you knew from the context I provide; I hope he's happy with the legacy he left. RE: Grand River Transit - danbrotherston - 09-20-2022 (09-20-2022, 07:47 AM)jamincan Wrote:(09-16-2022, 11:11 AM)Bytor Wrote: If you mean Thomas Schmidt, he retired several months ago. To be fair, part of his legacy is LRT...which is nothing to scoff at... RE: Grand River Transit - taylortbb - 10-12-2022 GRT seems to have had a bit of an issue at Madison/Charles today. One of the brand-new hybrid buses too. RE: Grand River Transit - ijmorlan - 10-12-2022 (10-12-2022, 10:01 PM)taylortbb Wrote: GRT seems to have had a bit of an issue at Madison/Charles today. One of the brand-new hybrid buses too. Very strange. I don’t believe that is a bus route, it’s not an obvious route, and they’re usually very careful about where buses drive — they don’t ad lib their routes, even when a diversion is needed. I wonder how it happened. Full size bus? That makes it even weirder. RE: Grand River Transit - danbrotherston - 10-13-2022 I mean, forget GRT routes, obviously that's not on or near a route. We don't even know if the bus was in service, but it doesn't matter. There is no reason ANY driver of ANY vehicle should be in this situation. The fact the operator didn't understand that this would end badly shows they should not be driving. |