Cycling in Waterloo Region - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: Cycling in Waterloo Region (/showthread.php?tid=186) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
|
RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - danbrotherston - 07-10-2018 (07-10-2018, 06:59 PM)Canard Wrote: Speed Bumps are awful for everyone. Speed bumps are terrible. They are also different from speed humps or speed cushions, which are also different from speed tables or raised intersections/crossings. You are right that one of the biggest problems with speed humps (I assume you mean, when you suggest drivers traverse them at 30 km/h...which is...ahh...quite damaging on a speed bump as I once found out), is that drivers move along at 50-60 km/h, brake hard to get to 20-30, then accelerate hard to get back to 50-60. Meaning, the speed hump fails to have the desired effect of slowing traffic and also cause increased wear and fuel usage. This problem occurs, I believe, because speed humps are deployed on roads which are designed for 60km/h traffic, as "calming". If the road is already designed to limit drivers to around 30-40 km/h, then the speed hump could be used to smooth over a section of the road where other calming measures might not be as effective (i.e., a straight section that is widened to enable parking, for example). In this case, drivers are already traveling at the right speed, and the speed hump only encourages them to keep doing that. As for cyclists, you're absolutely right, the CoK has been frustratingly stupid when implementing them on Glasgow, the literally put them in the bike lane, instead of the road. Insanity! Fortunately, that is not a necessary feature of speed humps. Here is my alternate design https://drive.google.com/open?id=1yWcYJZYt6Taseu8g9_7oCdXJ14fMX00T&usp=sharing I did see a lot of speed humps and raised crossings in the Netherlands, and while I'm not sure how they feel about them there, I rarely rode over them on a bike when I wasn't approaching an intersection already, and they seemed to be effective, I didn't hear a lot of hard braking or acceleration around them. Here's a great photo of a raised crossing in the Netherlands: https://twitter.com/MattPinder1/status/1014844979351511045 They are somewhat annoying for bus passengers, and can be a problem for snowplows if built poorly, which is why they should be used only when it is really necessary and valuable...which brings us to raised crossings or raised intersections, the best place for speed humps, where they have the most benefit and the least cost (since drivers should already be slowing down). Sadly, rarely is that where they are placed. I think we have a very negative view of speed cushions here because they're usually deployed in the wrong places, and for the wrong reasons, and as a result are usually ineffective. But I think they have their place if used in the right places to be effective and useful. My 2 cents. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - Canard - 07-10-2018 I say this as a driver: I honestly hope to god one day someone wakes up and mandates the equivalent of ATP into cars - the car just physically will not let you go faster than what the speed limit is in a given area. I cannot fathom the pushback from this, but I'm so effing tired of being bullied off the road by virtually every other driver out there for simply trying to drive safely and efficiently. Wait a minute - isn't this the cycling thread? ( ) RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - clasher - 07-10-2018 I think a segregated bike lane on Glasgow street would have a calming effect, at least it would narrow the road. It's also ridiculous that it's signed 40km/h when it's pretty much a main street. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - tomh009 - 07-10-2018 (07-10-2018, 09:08 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: You are right that one of the biggest problems with speed humps (I assume you mean, when you suggest drivers traverse them at 30 km/h...which is...ahh...quite damaging on a speed bump as I once found out), is that drivers move along at 50-60 km/h, brake hard to get to 20-30, then accelerate hard to get back to 50-60. Meaning, the speed hump fails to have the desired effect of slowing traffic and also cause increased wear and fuel usage. Not everyone. Some people, yes. Possibly even majority (though we don't know). But I would typically drive 40ish between humps, and then take my foot off the gas before each hump to go down to 30ish. Not much fierce acceleration or braking going on. But without somebody doing speed measurements on such roads, we don't really know how many people drive in what manner. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - Canard - 07-10-2018 We don't really know anything then, do we. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - Rainrider22 - 07-10-2018 (07-10-2018, 09:24 PM)Canard Wrote: I say this as a driver: I honestly hope to god one day someone wakes up and mandates the equivalent of ATP into cars - the car just physically will not let you go faster than what the speed limit is in a given area. That's a bit extreme.... RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - tomh009 - 07-10-2018 (07-10-2018, 09:50 PM)Canard Wrote: We don't really know anything then, do we. "If you can not measure it, you can not improve it." -- Lord Kelvin RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - Canard - 07-11-2018 RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - Canard - 07-11-2018 I biked to work last week. Part of my commute (one of two possible ways to get from Kitchener to Cambridge) is along Old Mill Road bear Conestoga College. The bridge there is under reconstruction, and has been closed to motor traffic but open to pedestrians and cyclists. Last week, an orange sign appeared indicating it would be closed to pedestrians and cyclists from 7am-5pm during the week. I arrived at 6:58am, so just made it! Yesterday morning, the sign had been altered to give another week to the closure. No big deal, it still said only closed between 7am-5pm. I passed at 6:54am, which was fine, and planned to be back across after 5pm. When I arrived at about 5:02pm... the section with the times had been removed, and the access to the bridge completely blocked! https://twitter.com/canardiain/status/1016789531847249920?s=21 How is this even remotely fair? The detour options (none of which are posted) are absolutely suicidal. A pedestrian came by and she and I contemplated what to do for a few minutes... This is a stark contrast to what Brantford did for one of their closures: https://twitter.com/canardiain/status/1015789188103458817?s=21 RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - Canard - 07-11-2018 Two of my coworkers were hit by cars yesterday! One was clipped by a work truck+trailer at Ottawa and Courtland. The second got hit by a car in a roundabout in Cambridge (Can-Amera and Conestoga). Both wiped out and are really cut up. Neither reported to police; I encouraged them both to do so, if only to at least add to the statatistics so these things get captured for future upgrades etc. I work at a small company (~20 people) so when 10% of your staff are involved in bike/car crashes that’s pretty scary. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - Viewfromthe42 - 07-11-2018 On my commute to work this morning, two separate cars seemingly tried to hit cyclists with the right of way. In both cases, the cyclist was in the intersection (one a four way stop, the other a set of lights), and a car could be heard accelerating towards the cyclist, before slamming on the brakes, as though to say "get out of here". The common thread: both were on sharrowed roads. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - danbrotherston - 07-11-2018 (07-11-2018, 08:38 AM)Canard Wrote: Two of my coworkers were hit by cars yesterday! That's terrible! Sorry to hear about that. That's incredibly demoralizing. Reporting to police is really important (and I think a legal requirement) if one needs to make any insurance claims. Do you know if the drivers stopped? RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - KevinL - 07-11-2018 Wow, that's a terrible state of affairs. Really condemning of our municipalites' attitude to cycling in general. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - panamaniac - 07-11-2018 (07-11-2018, 08:57 AM)danbrotherston Wrote:(07-11-2018, 08:38 AM)Canard Wrote: Two of my coworkers were hit by cars yesterday! That's my understanding as well. Failing to report a collision that resulted in injuries would amount to leaving the scene of an accident (although how the police would know about it to be able to lay charges is another matter ...). RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - Rainrider22 - 07-11-2018 (07-11-2018, 09:42 AM)panamaniac Wrote:(07-11-2018, 08:57 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: That's terrible! Any collision involving a motor vehicle, anywhere, involving personal injury must reported by law, to the police. |