Trails - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: Trails (/showthread.php?tid=378) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
|
RE: Trails - danbrotherston - 01-17-2019 (01-17-2019, 05:08 PM)Viewfromthe42 Wrote: As exciting as PXOs can be (if done properly, such that a bicycle can easily trigger them without needing to dismount), some of the quiet streets where it is mostly residential I would still prefer to see as speed tables where signage would indicate that road traffic must yield to the trail users. We have many such streets that Spur Line and Iron Horse trails cross, and in neighbourhoods asking for traffic calming. A PXO doesn't preclude a speed table. As for signage requiring road users to yield to trail users, PXO *is* the signage, and the ONLY legal way to do so (at least that the city would consider). RE: Trails - jamincan - 01-17-2019 What is the justification for the rule that cyclists need to walk their bikes through a PXO? RE: Trails - danbrotherston - 01-17-2019 The justification? That the HTA hasn't been updated properly to allow crossrides under a PXO...I suspect it won't be under the current regime. Literally no other reason, crossrides are allowed on other types of crossings. The root of the problem is that only Ontario needs this "special" "made in Ontario" type of crossing that's governed distinctly from crosswalks. RE: Trails - ijmorlan - 01-17-2019 (01-17-2019, 07:08 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: The justification? Combined with a lack of creativity from our designers. Make the path a road with no general traffic lanes, only bicycle lanes and sidewalks. Install normal traffic lights. Voilà! And while it’s an example of what might be called creative compliance, it also has the benefit of treating the active transportation route as co-equal with motor vehicle routes: it’s a road, not some second-class “pathway”. RE: Trails - danbrotherston - 01-17-2019 (01-17-2019, 10:21 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(01-17-2019, 07:08 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: The justification? Yeah, I think I did ask the question of whether MUTs were governed by the HTA, certainly there's an argument to be made that they are...as you are making, and I think that wouldn't be unreasonable. It's certainly an interesting philosophical question. But it does subject them to a substantial number of regulations and standards that don't otherwise apply. For example the scooter pilot couldn't happen, it was only allowed because the trails *weren't* roads, where scooters are technically illegal. I'm sure there are signage and similar issues. Regardless, we could do better, but at this point, whats proposed is so vastly better than what we have, even I'm not going to complain about the proposal. As an aside, I have no idea what the laws in the Netherlands are, but there at least, the priority is on the design itself making sense...I.e., it looks right, red pathways continues through an intersection when the red pathways (the cycle track) has the right of way, it doesn't when it doesn't...so visual cues mean that everyone knows what to do without really having to read, understand, and be familiar with the laws and signage. I sure wish we'd do that... RE: Trails - Canard - 02-16-2019 Pedestrian island being considered where Spurline Trail crosses Union Street in Waterloo - CBC.ca RE: Trails - ijmorlan - 02-16-2019 (02-16-2019, 08:37 AM)Canard Wrote: Pedestrian island being considered where Spurline Trail crosses Union Street in Waterloo - CBC.ca I don’t know whether to be pleased that they are doing it, or annoyed that they dismissed that suggestion from me when I made it at a public meeting about the trail before construction (and started blathering something about pedestrian crossovers instead). It obviously should be done; and even if later an official crossover or signals are installed, the island would still make sense. Now I just hope they build it big enough. Anybody want to start a pool on whether it will actually be big enough? Recent precedent is not encouraging. RE: Trails - danbrotherston - 02-16-2019 (02-16-2019, 10:59 AM)ijmorlan Wrote:(02-16-2019, 08:37 AM)Canard Wrote: Pedestrian island being considered where Spurline Trail crosses Union Street in Waterloo - CBC.ca Lol, I'm glad it'll be done... I suspect that city staff really wanted a different design, like a crossover or a signal, but couldn't get the region to agree. Which is part of why this is so delayed. Of course, maybe that should all have been public. My only concern is that I think Union should get bike lanes, and that may become impossible with an island. RE: Trails - ijmorlan - 02-16-2019 (02-16-2019, 11:04 AM)danbrotherston Wrote:(02-16-2019, 10:59 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: I don’t know whether to be pleased that they are doing it, or annoyed that they dismissed that suggestion from me when I made it at a public meeting about the trail before construction (and started blathering something about pedestrian crossovers instead). It obviously should be done; and even if later an official crossover or signals are installed, the island would still make sense. What does the Region have to do with it? Is Union a Regional road? Agreed the discussion should have been public. Way too much of this stuff happens in private, as if they were discussing which type of blind to install in their offices, rather than an important component of the public realm. RE: Trails - danbrotherston - 02-16-2019 (02-16-2019, 02:59 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(02-16-2019, 11:04 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Lol, I'm glad it'll be done... The region controls all traffic signals, including those on city owned roads. RE: Trails - MidTowner - 02-17-2019 (02-16-2019, 10:59 AM)ijmorlan Wrote:(02-16-2019, 08:37 AM)Canard Wrote: Pedestrian island being considered where Spurline Trail crosses Union Street in Waterloo - CBC.ca Aw jeez. I didn't think of that. I'll be pleasantly surprised if it's large enough for a human to cram next to a stroller, let alone a person with a bike, or two. I'm in favour of cluttering up Union with anything that can be dreamt up. A PXO would be great, an island would be great. Anything. The road is way overbuilt east of Moore, and that's the reason the trail crossing doesn't work, and the intersection at Moore can feel so unsafe. I think the trail crossing would need no special infrastructure, if it weren't for motorists getting ready for a road that suddenly allows them to drive really fast. RE: Trails - Spokes - 02-19-2019 (02-16-2019, 10:59 AM)ijmorlan Wrote:(02-16-2019, 08:37 AM)Canard Wrote: Pedestrian island being considered where Spurline Trail crosses Union Street in Waterloo - CBC.ca Don't be annoyed. If there's one thing Waterloo likes to do is ignore smart ideas, construct the project without them, and add them afterwards. RE: Trails - clasher - 02-19-2019 (02-19-2019, 09:32 AM)Spokes Wrote: Don't be annoyed. If there's one thing Waterloo likes to do is ignore smart ideas, construct the project without them, and add them afterwards. Waterloo would also rather roll-their-own dumb idea and ignore best-practices used elsewhere while also patting themselves on the back for a "made in Waterloo" solution... and justifying it because they once got a silver ranking in bike infrastructure. RE: Trails - Spokes - 02-19-2019 I couldn't agree more. There are a lot of really smart cities out there, copying them doesn't make us less smart. RE: Trails - Canard - 02-20-2019 |