Grand River Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: Grand River Transit (/showthread.php?tid=13) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
|
RE: Grand River Transit - MidTowner - 07-27-2017 I take the 200 daily, and have only experienced the new machines twice. When I asked a driver about it this morning, his explanation was that "I'm from Cambridge. They haven't done Cambridge yet." RE: Grand River Transit - Canard - 07-27-2017 While it may be that 75% are outfitted, it could very well be that the distribution is not even. All the cheese is on one side of the pizza! RE: Grand River Transit - DHLawrence - 07-27-2017 There's a shocker. RE: Grand River Transit - goggolor - 07-28-2017 GRT has confirmed that once fall service starts September 4, the #7 will run on King Street and the 200 iXpress on Park Street (stops at Park/Green and Uptown Waterloo). Apparently both buses can't run on King St because there isn't enough room for the 200 to pass the 7. http://www.grt.ca/Modules/News/index.aspx?newsId=f26d6f99-8276-487b-b501-5e6fc7870e69&feedId=bbee2b8e-91b6-4696-8c3d-481dbf28de8e,24b9d7cd-762a-4496-ad74-4e816cb9adc8,d23e5a74-6488-4978-9740-594267f59ea8,38cb3425-641c-49a2-a83b-f03081ea8431,31820c97-a4b0-4704-ab8b-7c088247077a,69a9e0f5-98d5-4bcc-8f1e-5537cb4c997b RE: Grand River Transit - MidTowner - 07-28-2017 My reaction when I read that was a four-letter word I wouldn't use here. I feel like riders in Midtown have been jerked around a lot- for a while, the 200 was stopping on Union, with no stops between Weber and Victoria and King and Union. Then, it was stopping at Weber and Guelph to replace service at that stop when the 4 was detoured (though the two routes have significantly different service). When a number of people complained, service was restored (since the winter) to Weber and Guelph. Now, service is being shifted 1.5 kilometres west to Park. Plenty of 200 users who live near Weber will not be served by that. I understand the desire to serve the hospital with the 200, but I'm not sure of the logic of moving the 7 a few hundred metres east from Park to King, and the 200 fifteen hundred metres west to Park. Why not leave the 7 on Park, and have the 200 use King? It would build some ridership for Ion, and be minimally disruptive to people who have come to rely on the current detours. RE: Grand River Transit - ijmorlan - 07-28-2017 (07-28-2017, 09:34 AM)goggolor Wrote: GRT has confirmed that once fall service starts September 4, the #7 will run on King Street and the 200 iXpress on Park Street (stops at Park/Green and Uptown Waterloo). Apparently both buses can't run on King St because there isn't enough room for the 200 to pass the 7. http://www.grt.ca/Modules/News/index.aspx?newsId=f26d6f99-8276-487b-b501-5e6fc7870e69&feedId=bbee2b8e-91b6-4696-8c3d-481dbf28de8e,24b9d7cd-762a-4496-ad74-4e816cb9adc8,d23e5a74-6488-4978-9740-594267f59ea8,38cb3425-641c-49a2-a83b-f03081ea8431,31820c97-a4b0-4704-ab8b-7c088247077a,69a9e0f5-98d5-4bcc-8f1e-5537cb4c997b I’d be more worried about there not being space on Park St. for the 200 to pass all the general traffic, in particular near Glasgow but elsewhere as well. Anyway, is there any valid reason why the 200 can’t use the LRT right of way? RE: Grand River Transit - Markster - 07-28-2017 Keep in mind that the ideal state is both routes using King St. The 200 was never intended to serve people who live near Weber. The Weber/Guelph stop was always an interim measure that GRT was loathe to introduce because they feared (perhaps rightly) that people would grow to expect it to last in perpetuity. Route 7's absence from King St has been a pain point for a lot of Midtown residents for a long time, and they are better served by the 7 than the 200. With the 7 off of Park St, I suspect that Park St is a faster route for the 200 than Weber, so that's why the 200 would be moving there. [EDIT] wow huh. Both routes are exactly 4km. Speed is probably a wash. I just think it's a shame that they can't use the transit reserved lanes on King St to run both buses back where they belong. RE: Grand River Transit - MidTowner - 07-28-2017 "Route 7's absence from King St has been a pain point for a lot of Midtown residents for a long time, and they are better served by the 7 than the 200." This is true. An area that had phenomenal transit service in the form of the 7 and 200 suddenly had very poor service, but the impact was more from the 7's disappearance than the 200's. Weber would certainly be the faster route over Park for the 200. Park will at some hours of the day be slow (Weber never is). I have to retract my comment about using the 200 to build ridership patterns to support Ion. I do believe that (give people making residential and other decisions the option to use transit now, before Ion is running), but it was a pretty silly thing to say in this context. Park and Green is extremely close to the GRH station, so if King is really out of the question, that's a great place for the 200 to stop. I would say it should stop at Allen, too. RE: Grand River Transit - Viewfromthe42 - 07-28-2017 I think a simple answer would be that the 7 stops at different spots near the hospital, and picks up people at a shorter stop spacing along its length. In combination, this allows for the infirm to more easily get from home to the hospital. If you move the 7 to Weber, there would only be one hospital stop (on the 200), increasing their walk at GRH, and either they have to walk to the closest 200 stop at home (increasing their walk), or they need to transfer between the 7 and the 200 (increasing their trip time from the current 7-only situation, and possibly their walk, though most of the logical transfer points wouldn't add much/any aside from an extra on/off of the bus). RE: Grand River Transit - KevinL - 07-28-2017 From GRT's perspective, they're doing their best to restore pre-construction conditions, namely the 7 serving frequent stops on King and the 200 serving an anchor stop at the hospital. This move restores that. As much as I'd like to see the 200 skip traffic in the LRT lane, I imagine GrandLInq would have far too many issues with that proposal for it to work. RE: Grand River Transit - ijmorlan - 07-28-2017 (07-28-2017, 12:42 PM)KevinL Wrote: From GRT's perspective, they're doing their best to restore pre-construction conditions, namely the 7 serving frequent stops on King and the 200 serving an anchor stop at the hospital. This move restores that. You’re probably right, except that we were promised that emergency services could use the LRT lanes. If that is OK, then it should be OK for a bus to use them, especially temporarily and especially when there are no LRVs running. RE: Grand River Transit - danbrotherston - 07-28-2017 (07-28-2017, 05:34 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(07-28-2017, 12:42 PM)KevinL Wrote: From GRT's perspective, they're doing their best to restore pre-construction conditions, namely the 7 serving frequent stops on King and the 200 serving an anchor stop at the hospital. This move restores that. These are not even remotely similar: The bus, which has no direct connection with the LRT ops center, will be using the LRT right of way every 4-20 minutes (two ways remember) for a significant distance along the right of way, while Grandlinq is trying to complete the route so crews will be working in the right of way, and then they will be testing LRT trains in the right of way. Is completely different from an ambulance occasionally using the LRT right of way during operations of the LRT when the right of way is cleared of Grandlinq contractors and other personnel, for a short distance to bypass traffic, when they have a direct communications with the ops center to gain clearance. And by September, Grandlinq should be testing trains. RE: Grand River Transit - tomh009 - 07-28-2017 8 is still going to be running on Weber, is it not? Does that not also server Midtown residents living near Weber? RE: Grand River Transit - KevinL - 07-28-2017 There will be a new route much like the 8 (labeled '18' on the proposal map) that will run the length of Weber from University to Fairway, with the exception of Downtown where it will divert to serve Ion. So yes, once Ion launches there will be service in the area. RE: Grand River Transit - Elmira Guy - 07-28-2017 At the risk of being repetitive, sure wish they would see the wisdom in running a route on Weber north of University. |